Labor Relations Legal Interpretations of Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1048 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3



Determination of Supervisory Status

In another case, five docking captains employed by Pacific Coast Docking Pilots sought to unionize with a secret vote of five to zero being entered in favor of adopting the union as the bargaining agent for these docking pilots with the company. Pacific Coast Docking Pilots refused to recognize the union as the legal bargaining entity, claiming that the docking pilots were not employees but were actually supervisors as defined by the Labor-Management Relations Act. As such, the docking pilots would not be eligible to form a collective bargaining unit with the protections of the Act and the National Labor Relations Board. The union field an unfair labor practices grievance against the employer and won a summary judgment, which was then appealed by the employer with the above arguments cited as a reason. Determining whether the docking pilots are actually supervisors is not as simple as might be hoped, however, as the following clearly demonstrates.

According to the LMRA, any individual that engages in the act of hiring, promoting, or terminating employees, directs employee activities, or assigns work (or engages in several other tasks not relevant to the case at hand) is a supervisor. In their capacity as docking captains, the five individuals in question make recommendations as to the hiring and the promotion of other individuals to the position of docking captain, and they are also responsible for determining the number of tugboats needed for docking and for the placement of these tugs. The employer contends that this makes the docking captains supervisors.

Stuck Writing Your "Labor Relations Legal Interpretations Of" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Labor Relations Legal Interpretations of Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



The union maintains, however, that the docking captains do not engage in any supervisory behavior; their recommendations in terms of hiring are not decisions, nor do they have this power, and their direction of the tugboat captains is limited to assigning them placement -- tugboat captains have complete supervisory authority over the specific actions of their crews. A careful reading of the law, specifically the part that demands individuals be using "independent judgment" in each of the identified actions in order to be counted as supervisors, suggests that the docking captains are employees and not supervisors. They exercise no independent judgment in terms of hiring, firing, or promotion, as these decision are made by others, nor do they truly direct the work actions of others independently -- tugboat captains make their own determination about specific work actions that need to be taken, and they delegate these tasks to employees independently. As such, the unionization of the docking captains is protected by the LMRA.

Conclusion

As both of these cases show, interpreting labor laws to settle disputes is much easier said than done. While it is of course fully possible to interpret and apply the law, many issues are far from black and white, and a certain degree of personal and subjective judgment is needed to arrive at a decision. This clearly illustrates the need for judicial as well as legislative processes in the managing of labor relations, with human deliberation needed to solve what are ultimately human problems......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labor Relations Legal Interpretations Of" (2010, September 25) Retrieved May 10, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labor-relations-legal-interpretations-8277

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labor Relations Legal Interpretations Of" 25 September 2010. Web.10 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labor-relations-legal-interpretations-8277>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labor Relations Legal Interpretations Of", 25 September 2010, Accessed.10 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labor-relations-legal-interpretations-8277
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example