Leadership in Simplistic Terms, There Essay

Total Length: 1215 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 7

Page 1 of 4

The authors also find that the firms where these antecedents are most present are those in which either leadership style is highly evident. Firms that lack either leadership style are the lowest performing with respect to quality management.

The ultimate objective of any leader is to improve the company's performance. The most basic measures of performance are profit, revenue, market share and other financial statement measures. Even if the leader excels at other elements, if they do not translate to the bottom line, then the leader is not meeting the needs of the shareholders. Whittington et al. (2009) have found that organizational performance is most positively affected by transactional leadership, whereas transformational leadership as found to have no impact. By contrast, Spinelli (2006) found the opposite -- that transformational leadership was more effective at delivering performance outcomes. This again hints that the best leadership style is dependent on the situation.

Part of the reason for the divergence in effectiveness stems from the differences in the way the two leadership styles impact the organization. The transactional style results in an organization that cultivates strong trust in the leader, greater affective commitment and strong organizational citizenship (Whittington et al., 2009). By contrast, transformational leaders have a higher degree of emotional intelligence, which allows the transformational leader to be more effective motivators -- they do not command tasks but they can empower their employees to take greater command over tasks (Harms & Crede, 2010).
This supports Pieterse's contention that transformational leadership requires empowerment. Without psychological empowerment, transformational leadership is not effective. The equivalent in transactional leadership would be a leader who does not understand the industry or the firm's value chain.

The evidence suggests that transformational leadership has more benefits to the company than does transactional leadership. Even on metrics where the latter would be predicted to outperform, it does not. A simple explanation could be that transactional leadership always exists to some degree in an organization, but it does not require transformational leadership in order to succeed. Transactional leaders therefore do not surround themselves with transformational leaders. A transformational leader, however, must surround his or herself with transactional leaders. By virtue of having a big picture perspective, the transformational leader understands his or her weaknesses and takes steps to address those weaknesses. This results in the firm having a more complete set of leadership skills than firms with transactional leaders only. This implies that transformational leadership is not inherently superior, but that it is more often combined with transactional leadership. Transactional leadership, by contrast, is not often combined with transformational leadership, which explains the reduced performance of firms with transactional leaders.

Works.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership In Simplistic Terms There" (2010, May 07) Retrieved May 3, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-simplistic-terms-2797

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership In Simplistic Terms There" 07 May 2010. Web.3 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-simplistic-terms-2797>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Leadership In Simplistic Terms There", 07 May 2010, Accessed.3 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/leadership-simplistic-terms-2797