Is It Legal for Your Family to Read Your E-Mail? Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1220 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 4

Privacy

Justin Ellsworth's parents should not have been given access to his e-mail account on their request alone, as it would have violated nearly every privacy act in existence at the time of the case, the Yahoo agreement terms with Justin, and set a dangerous precedence for invasion of digital assets of the deceased. Yahoo relented and only provided the e-mail account access on court order, which preserved the digital rights and privacy of its millions of customers using Yahoo mail and other online e-mail applications in the process (Leach 2005). Yahoo argued successfully that providing access without court order would have violated the Stored Communications Act (SCA), 18. U.S.C. § 2701. This has become an often-cited precedent by all other Internet e-mail providers who must retain the trust of their customers to stay in business. The case has a multifaceted ethical aspect to it, which is analyzed from a deontological and utilitarian standpoint below.

Analysis of E-mail Access from an Ethical Standpoint

Deontological reasoning is predicated on the findings of Kant (1981) who posited that moral laws take the form of categorical reasoning and imperatives including university, congeniality and community. Universality concentrates on the universal laws of nature, congeniality focused on treating persons as ends, never as mere means, and community where Kant believes the best ethical outcomes come from a decision maker putting themselves in the role of subject and sovereignty (Ralph, 1999). Using deontological ethics to evaluate the decision of whether to allow the Ellsworths to gain access to their deceased son's Yahoo e-mail account raises the ethical dilemma of defining a parents' right to know of their son's thoughts and emotions immediately before his untimely death. The ethical dilemma for Yahoo is however seen from a global standpoint, where the deontological conflict of needing to preserve the rights of e-mail customers to their privacy, even in death as predicated on their agreement with the company upon signing up for e-mail, versus the need of a family for closure in the unanticipated death of their son.

Does the deontological ethics and implied moral responsibility or obligation Yahoo has to serve the family and provide them access to their decreased son's e-mail overrule the same responsibilities to its global base of customers? No, it doesn't.

Stuck Writing Your "Is It Legal for Your Family to Read Your E-Mail?" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Is It Legal for Your Family to Read Your E-Mail? Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Yet from a deontological perspective it could be argued either way, with the family having higher precedence to access over the broader interpretation of the law.

What makes access to e-mail a paradox from an deontological perspective is that universality and congeniality, two of the three formulations Kant defined in his categorical imperative, are plausibly met by serving the family first (Ralph, 1999). What makes the paradox so difficult is that community, the third categorical imperative, is clearly violated if Yahoo chooses to make an exception to its licensing agreement and provide the family access to the deceased soldier's e-mail account.

Deontological ethics must be interpreted across all three categorical imperatives if they are to provide the necessary foundation for ethical decision making (Irene, 2007). Yahoo stayed consistent with all three categorical imperatives and was able to alleviate any legal challenges as a result. The universality aspect of the case from a deontological perspective also shows that regardless of how many families, from varied circumstances regarding the loss of a loved one and family member, does not ever provide an exception to the violating of the three categorical imperatives either. In this context, Kant's definition of deontological reasoning resembles the core concepts of utilitarianism as well (Irene, 2007).

Deontological reasoning and utilitarianism share a commonality at the structural level as both look to provide consistency of ethical and moral direction based….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is It Legal For Your Family To Read Your E-Mail " (2014, September 08) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-family-read-e-mail-191622

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is It Legal For Your Family To Read Your E-Mail " 08 September 2014. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-family-read-e-mail-191622>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is It Legal For Your Family To Read Your E-Mail ", 08 September 2014, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-family-read-e-mail-191622
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example