Legal Precedent for a Situation Gone Wrong Essay

Total Length: 1120 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 8

Page 1 of 4

Legal Precedent for a Situation Gone Wrong

Influence of the courts over child custody arrangements in the case of a divorce is low to non-existent. There is a persistent expectation that the parents will come to an agreement about matters related to children, and it is generally not considered beneficial to engage the courts. It is important for disputing married couples to understand that there are three separate issues embedded in a divorce situation: 1) The actual divorce which concludes with a decree absolute; 2) Division of marital assets and financial provision for the spouses and children, which is referred to ancillary relief; and 3) proceedings focused on the custody / residence of children, contact arrangements with non-custodial parent, and so forth[footnoteRef:1]. [1: Terry & Co Solicitors, The Laurels, Shadoxhurst, Ashford, Kent, TN26 1NL United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.terry.co.uk/men_div.html]

Given this tendency of the court for a hands-off response to divorce proceedings related to children, Perry's initial reaction of alarm is understandable. Faced with the prospect of abduction of his child, Rose, Perry's attorney -- had he been given opportunity -- could have relied on a number of statutes to provide relief to Perry. If the abduction is anticipated but had not yet taken place, specific remedies of the court are available to Perry's attorney, including applying ex-parte in the High Court for the following:

A prohibited steps order

An order for delivery up of the child's UK passport by authority of Circuit Judge

An order restraining issue of passports;

An order restraining the other parent from removing a child from his residence

An interim residence order

A bond for return of the child after contact[footnoteRef:2] [2: http://www.reunite.org/edit/files/articles/Child%20Abduction-Case%20Management.pdf]

Moreover, the statutory framework related to child abduction and custody is multi-layered and comprehensive, and it includes the following statutes:

Supreme Court Act 1981

Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985:

Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980

European Convention 1980 is superseded by Brussels II Revised EC2201/2203

Family Law Act 1986 as amended 2005

Human Rights Act 1988

A number of rules also apply to child abduction and custody matters, including:

Family Proceedings Rules 1991, 5-7; Civil Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1989, Regulation 14; Anglo Pakistan Protocol January 2003 (Red Book P. 2647).

Stuck Writing Your "Legal Precedent for a Situation Gone Wrong" Essay?



Forsaking the lost opportunity for preventing a child abduction and settlement of marital discord, attention must be paid to Perry's battery of his wife, Naomi, which is a criminal offense distinct from assault, an offense that creates apprehension of the immediate commission of battery. Perry can be said to have committed battery since his behavior meets both prongs of the test: 1) The mens rea (fault element) can be proven as Perry acted intentionally or recklessly[footnoteRef:3] and 2) Perry could foresee that the result of choking his wife could result in her loosing consciousness or worse, and despite what is virtually a certain consequence of action, Perry nonetheless acted[footnoteRef:4]. Under English law, the R. v. Woollin [1998] decision applies to statutes related to murder but is commonly accepted as intent throughout U.K. criminal law. Indeed, with regard to intention and reckless behavior, the standard is that when a person acts and is aware of the associated risk with that action, but act regardless of this awareness and when no reasonable person would act, that person has acted recklessly[footnoteRef:5]. Battery is not held to be a statutory….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Precedent For A Situation Gone Wrong" (2015, July 07) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-precedent-situation-gone-wrong-197850

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Precedent For A Situation Gone Wrong" 07 July 2015. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-precedent-situation-gone-wrong-197850>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Precedent For A Situation Gone Wrong", 07 July 2015, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-precedent-situation-gone-wrong-197850