Legal Restraint Essay

Total Length: 654 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

Legal Restraint

It was a case in 1965, Griffin v. California, where a man was convicted of murder in part because he did not take the stand in his own defense. During the trial the prosecution instructed the jury that because the defendant did not take the stand they could take that into consideration and draw inferences that were "unfavorable to the defendant…." (Griffin) When this case was overturned there came a general rule that neither the prosecution nor the judge may mention to the jury the fact that the defendant did not take the stand. The Supreme Court determined that "the prosecutor's comment and the court's acquiescence are the equivalent of an offer of evidence and its acceptance." (Griffin) This was determined to be a violation of the Constitution's Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination because the defendant's inaction and refusal to speak was taken as evidence.

The Supreme Court was correct when it determined that a defendant's refusal to take the stand during a trial could not be considered by the jury as evidence against them. A person's right against self-incrimination is a fundamental right guaranteed in the Constitution and should not be infringed upon. If a defendant does not take the stand in trial they are simply exercising their constitutional rights and by mentioning this to the jury for consideration implies that the defendant did not take the stand because they would incriminate themselves.
This turns their exercise of their rights into evidence against them, and this evidence, in turn, is forced from them against their will. This is a violation of the Fifth Amendment.

Part 2

When it comes to lineups and other forms of identification of suspects, there has developed a strict protocol for conducting such events. This has grown out of the case of U.S. v. Wade in which the Supreme Court determined that a defendant's right to counsel was guaranteed not only at trial, but at "any critical confrontation by the prosecution….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

State Vs Federal Crime

this text will concern itself with kidnapping. Kidnapping, in basic terms, has got to do with the illegitimate or illegal restraint/imprisonment and transfer of an individual from a specified place to another against his or her will (Carper, McKinsey, and West, 2007). Kidnapping could be prosecuted in either federal or state courts. Kidnapping as a Federal Offense When state lines are breached, then kidnapping automatically becomes a federal felony. More specifically, in the words of Bacigal (2008), “whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person when the person is willfully transported in interstate or foreign commerce”… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Restraint" (2012, December 02) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-restraint-106362

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Restraint" 02 December 2012. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-restraint-106362>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Legal Restraint", 02 December 2012, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/legal-restraint-106362