On Liberty and Mill S Utilitarian Philosophy Essay

Total Length: 739 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Mill's basic principle, assess the legitimacy of laws (a) requiring motorists to wear helmets, (b) preventing people from walking naked in public parks, (c) forbidding people to take drugs like cocaine or heroin, or (d) outlawing skateboarding in certain areas.

Mill's "harm principle" as stated in On Liberty could possibly be a legitimate reason to enforce wearing helmets for motorists, outlaw people from walking naked in parks, outlaw cocaine or heroin usage, and ban skateboarding in certain areas. Yet, as Mill (1859) himself states, "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others" (p. 21). With that said, one may be able to object to the application of Mill's "harm principle" in so far as it applies to motorists, nudists, drug users, and skateboarders for the simple reason that they are not necessarily harming others but possibly only harming themselves. This point, of course, could be debated both ways.

First, it could be said that motorists should wear helmets to protect themselves -- but Mill's "harm principle" clearly states that the power should only be exercised "to prevent harm to others," from which one can infer that we should be quite free to harm ourselves if we so desire.

Stuck Writing Your "On Liberty and Mill S Utilitarian Philosophy" Essay?

In fact, Mill states, "His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant" (p. 21) to exercise laws against him. So then the motorist should be free to drive without protective wear -- unless it could be argued that by doing so the motorist is also a danger to others. Is he? Perhaps it could be argued that by setting a reckless or careless attitude, which might inspire others who are impressionable to think that they can drive irresponsibly, the helmetless motorist is harming others.

As for the nudist, is he harming anyone by walking naked? Yes and no. Some might say, again, that the nudity is shocking and inciting, while others might say the nudist is only exposing himself so it is no harm to others. Yet, some might not wish to be exposed to such nudity in a public place. So this could go both ways. The same could be said of the drug user: he is only harming himself -- unless it can be shown that in harming himself he is also a danger or a….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"On Liberty And Mill S Utilitarian Philosophy" (2015, September 12) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/liberty-mill-utilitarian-philosophy-2155780

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"On Liberty And Mill S Utilitarian Philosophy" 12 September 2015. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/liberty-mill-utilitarian-philosophy-2155780>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"On Liberty And Mill S Utilitarian Philosophy", 12 September 2015, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/liberty-mill-utilitarian-philosophy-2155780