Marie Schwartz V. Philip Morris Companies Inc. Term Paper

Total Length: 891 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Marie Schwartz v. Philip Morris Companies Inc. The six-week trial took place in the state of Oregon and was tried in Multnomah County Circuit Court before Judge Roosevelt Robinson. Family members filed a wrongful death case against Philip Morris on behalf of decedent Michele Schwartz, who smoked Merit Lights from 1976 until her death. Claims presented before the jury include negligence, strict liability and fraud. The deliberation lasted for four days. ("$150m Jury Award In Light Cigarette Suit," 2002)

It has been reported that Philip Morris argued at trial that the deceased understood the dangers and risks associated with smoking but chose to consume the product and should be held responsible for her choice. The plaintiffs countered that the decedent consumed light cigarettes with the goal to stop smoking but that the Merit Light cigarettes proved to be a psychosomatic crutch for her and interrupted her efforts.

The plaintiffs also argued that Philip Morris promoted low-tar cigarettes as a safer and healthier substitute to standard cigarettes. ("$150m Jury Award In Light Cigarette Suit," 2002)

At the end of the trial and the four-day deliberation the jury awarded millions of dollars.

The following is a summary of the amounts that the jury awarded to the Schwartz family.

For the negligence claim, the jury awarded Schwarz $118,514.

Stuck Writing Your "Marie Schwartz V. Philip Morris Companies Inc." Term Paper?

22 in economic damages, $50,000 in noneconomic damages and $25 million in punitive damages. Concerning the strict liability claim, the jury awarded Schwarz 22 in economic damages, $50,000 in noneconomic damages and $10 million in punitive damages. Concerning the fraud claim, the jury awarded Schwarz $118,515.22 in economic damages, $50,000 in noneconomic damages and $115 million in punitive damages. Ultimately an Oregon judge reduced the punitive damages to $100 million and reduced the verdicts on the negligence and strict liability claim to $60,442.25 in economic damages and $25,000 in noneconomic damages." ("$150m Jury Award In Light Cigarette Suit," 2002)

The outcome of the case is based on the wrongful death statute in the state of Oregon. The wrongful death statute alleges that the decedent was killed as a result of negligence on the part of Philip Morris, and that the surviving dependents or beneficiaries are entitled to financial damages as a result of the defendant's conduct. Negligence is a tort consisting of the breach of a duty of care resulting in damage to the plaintiff.

Wrongful death claims can be made in cases of automobile accidents, defective products, malpractice and other wrongful behavior that causes the death of an individual. Immediate family members including spouses and children can make a wrongful death claim. Some states.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Marie Schwartz V Philip Morris Companies Inc " (2002, October 03) Retrieved May 18, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/marie-schwartz-philip-morris-companies-inc-135989

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Marie Schwartz V Philip Morris Companies Inc " 03 October 2002. Web.18 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/marie-schwartz-philip-morris-companies-inc-135989>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Marie Schwartz V Philip Morris Companies Inc ", 03 October 2002, Accessed.18 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/marie-schwartz-philip-morris-companies-inc-135989