Total Length: 1864 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)
Total Sources: 6
Page 1 of 6
Callingham, R. (2010). Mathematics assessment in primary classrooms: Making it count. Tasmania.
Curllette, W. (2006). A framework for research studies: Mixed methods through combining Bayesian statistics and qualitative research in individual psychology. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 338-349.
Ginsburg, H. (2009). The Challenge of Formative Assessment in Mathematics Education: Children's Minds, Teachers' Minds. Human Development, 109-128.
McAlister, B. (n.d.). The Authenticity of Authentic Assessment. University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Mundia, L. (2012). The Assessment of Math Learning Difficulties in a Primary Grade-4 Child with High Support Needs: Mixed Methods Approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 347-366.
Reilly, E. (2007). Writing to learn Mathematics: A Mixed Method Study. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. (2013). Assessing Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving and Problem-Posing Skills. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 54-60.
Tanner, D. (1997). The long (suit) and the short (comings) of authentic assessment. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Phoenix.
Latest APA Format (6th edition)
"Mathematics Assessment" (2016, November 20) Retrieved July 9, 2020, from
Latest MLA Format (8th edition)
"Mathematics Assessment" 20 November 2016. Web.9 July. 2020. <
Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)
"Mathematics Assessment", 20 November 2016, Accessed.9 July. 2020,