Medical Malpractice and Insurance Book Review

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1565 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 5

Medical Malpractice Myth Review

A summary of the book

The Medical Malpractice Myth authored by Tom Baker, tackles the complex subject of medical malpractices in an insightful and concise manner. Mr. Baker is an accomplished professor of law who specializes in Insurance and Tort Law. In the first few pages of the book, Mr. Baker, lays out the myth; i.e. that an unprecedented number of people are filing medical malpractice lawsuits and that lawyers and their clients are reaping hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars in unjustified awards, while medical doctors are struggling to pay huge insurance premiums which have already forced some to close their practices (Noah, 2005).

The book is written in eight chapters. In the first chapter, Baker lays out the myth and provides plenty of evidence to its contrary. He then points his readers to the real problem that is facing the health care industry; i.e. not too many lawsuits against physicians but too many instances of medical malpractices. He then explains that the real cost of medical malpractices is not the financial burden on doctors but the number of lost lives, pain, suffering lost wages and productivity and additional medical fees that those who are suing have to bear.

From the second chapter to the seventh one, Baker investigates and elaborates on a number of different aspects about the myth in detail. In the second chapter, he points to the fact that healthcare professionals and the public in general should be more worried with the rising cases of medical malpractice and not the number of lawsuits. In the third chapter, he persuasively contends that the real culprit for high medical malpractices insurance premiums is the insurance sector's management of reserves, profits and losses during different seasons of the underwriting cycle and not the litigations against doctors and hospitals (Baker, 2007). In the fourth chapter, Baker provides evidence against the notion that more and more patients are filing frivolous suits and that an increasing number of judges and juries are awarding them huge amounts of money in damages even in cases where physicians have observed their duty of care. Baker then covers the value of litigation in helping in compensating injured patients and in improving the safety of patents; the misconception that defensive medicine is one of the top reasons for increased costs of health care; and the myth that fear of facing malpractice lawsuits is decreasing the supply of physicians and making it difficult for people to access health care in the fifth, sixth and seventh chapters respectively.

Stuck Writing Your "Medical Malpractice and Insurance" Book Review?

View All Our Example Medical Malpractice and Insurance Book Review

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Lastly, in the final chapter Baker proposes a number of reforms to deal with some of the identified problems in the medical malpractice system of litigation (Noah, 2005).

All the reforms proposed by Baker are evidence-based and are meant to achieve the following goals:

1. Significantly reduce the incidences of medical malpractice

2. Increase awareness in the general public to enable patients to evaluate whether their negative medical outcomes constitute medical malpractices before they file lawsuits.

3. To improve compensation for medical injuries

4. To reform the medical malpractice insurance industry so that the underwriting cycle doesn't exert unnecessary financial pressure on doctors (Baker, 2007).

Baker acknowledges the fact that these reforms are not easy to achieve and that the individuals pushing for them will have to surmount significant challenges to achieve them (Noah, 2005).

The Motive for Writing the Medical Malpractice Myth

Baker (2007), describes his motive for writing the book as an effort to reframe the public discourse on medical malpractice lawsuits. And that by doing so the concerned parties can see the truth and start acting accordingly. According to Coombs, this shows that the targeted readers are politicians and other policymakers who might have accepted the myths and misconceptions that Baker is challenging in his book.

Illumination of One Or More of The Biomedical Ethical Concerns, Explicit or Implied, To Which the Book Gives Useful Insight.

Professor Baker highlights the thinking that there are many cases in which plaintiffs obtain large damages even though the defendants were not negligent; and that such lawsuits have led to: physicians wasting considerable resources on defensive medicine; significant increases in insurance premiums; and excellent physicians losing their jobs or closing their private practices (Coombs). However, according to him this is not true. Baker first highlights the fact that in a report to the congress, the Office of Technology Assessment, said there were no good or bad effects to medical malpractice litigations (Baker, 2007). He also points out that only two studies have somewhat indicated….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Medical Malpractice And Insurance" (2016, November 30) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/medical-malpractice-insurance-2162946

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Medical Malpractice And Insurance" 30 November 2016. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/medical-malpractice-insurance-2162946>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Medical Malpractice And Insurance", 30 November 2016, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/medical-malpractice-insurance-2162946
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example