Meta Analyses and Systematic Reviews Chapter

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 680 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 2

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSESDiscussion: Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesAccording to Corcoran and Pillai (2008) systematic reviews come in handy in not only the identification, but also the synthesis of the evidence considered to be of relevance to the research query. With this in mind, systematic reviews could be considered an enhanced form of the traditional literature review approach. This is more so the case given that systematic reviews makes use of, or deploy, systematic methods in the combination as well as assessment of available evidence (Corcoran and Pillai, 2008). In a far as validity of systematic reviews is concerned, Patole (2021) observes that this has got to do with “how trustworthy the review\'s conclusions are for a reader” (193). It is important to note that in epidemiology, systematic reviews could be used in the formulation of strategies meant to impact the health and wellbeing of populations. For this reason, the relevance of relying on conclusions that could be deemed trustworthy cannot be overstated. The said trustworthiness can be assessed in terms of validity. On this front, two concepts come in handy, i.e. internal validity and external validity. Internal validity, as Patole (2021) points out, relates to the strength of the study methodology.

Stuck Writing Your "Meta Analyses and Systematic Reviews" Chapter?

View All Our Example Meta Analyses and Systematic Reviews Chapter

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Towards this end, as the author further indicates, the issue of greatest relevance happens to be bias extent. Thus, in the context of epidemiology, what…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…some instances be biased by failure to include gray literature. Examples of gray literature on this front could be inclusive of, but is not limited to policy documents and government reports. Secondly, Corcoran and Pillai (2008) indicate that the absence of universal standards on various fronts (i.e. with regard to evidence evaluation) could result in poor quality or uncertain systematic reviews. It should also be noted that the problem of poor execution of meta-analyses could be a key limitation as it could make the same invalid. This is more so the case when appropriate studies are carelessly summarized or abstracted. Also, effects estimates could in some cases be meaningless – especially in those instances where….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Meta Analyses And Systematic Reviews" (2022, July 18) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/meta-analyses-systematic-reviews-2179403

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Meta Analyses And Systematic Reviews" 18 July 2022. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/meta-analyses-systematic-reviews-2179403>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Meta Analyses And Systematic Reviews", 18 July 2022, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/meta-analyses-systematic-reviews-2179403
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example