Michel Eyraud Investigation Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 792 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

Forensics and Michel Eyraud

When Toussaint-Augustin Gouffe was missing on July 27, 1889 in Paris, France authorities did not give much credence to his disappearance, however, when Gouffe still had not shown up three days later, the case was referred to Marie-Francois Garon, who resolved to find out what happened to Gouffe (Owen, 2008, p. 34). Three weeks later, a body was found near Millery, south of Lyon, and a few days after that, snail gatherers found a broken wooden trunk bearing a shipping label from Paris and smelling of death (Starr, 2010). It was only a matter of time before the victim's body would be identified and his killers were brought to justice, but only after a second autopsy was performed.

Gouffe was described as being 49-years-old, standing at 5'8," and having chestnut hair. However, after the initial autopsy, Dr. Paul Bernard concluded that despite the fact that the victim's body was missing the first right upper molar like Gouffe, the similarities ended there. Bernard determined that the body stood at 5'7," had black hair, and was between the ages of 35 and 45 (Starr, 2010). Furthermore, Landry, Gouffe's brother-in-law, could not provide a positive visual identification due to the extensive decomposition of the body (Starr, 2010).

Stuck Writing Your "Michel Eyraud Investigation" Case Study?

View All Our Example Michel Eyraud Investigation Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Gouffe's case would have been closed had Goron not received an anonymous tip months later. Apparently, Gouffe was last seen at the Brasserie Gutenberg with Michel Eyraud and Gabrielle Bompard, who happened to leave town after Gouffe disappeared. Thus, a second inquest was launched and Goron and Lacassagne were able to positively identify the unknown body as belonging to Gouffe.

Because Bernard had destroyed the body's skull and sternum, Lacassagne was unable to determine cause of death, however, through the use of anthropometrics he was able to successfully identify the body. By examining the sacral and coccyx junctions, hipbones, and teeth/mandible, Lacassagne ascertained the victim was 45 to 50-years-old, not 35 to 45 (Starr, 2010). Additionally, by studying six major bones -- femur, tibia, fibula, humerus, radius, and ulna -- Lacassagne was able to determine the victim was 5'8" and not 5'7," which Bernard had calculated by stretching the body out and adding 4cm to the total height, a standard practice of the time (Starr, 2010). Further examination of the bones also led Lacassagne to correctly determine Gouffe walked with a limp, had an arthritic right knee, and….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michel Eyraud Investigation" (2013, July 24) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michel-eyraud-investigation-97540

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michel Eyraud Investigation" 24 July 2013. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michel-eyraud-investigation-97540>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michel Eyraud Investigation", 24 July 2013, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michel-eyraud-investigation-97540
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example