Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1516 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 8

Page 1 of 5

Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test

It is assessed that at least 20 out of a hundred of adults who visit a physician have had an alcohol issue at one time. Also, in a survey of patients self-proclaimed to an inpatient service, 15 to 30 out of a hundred screened definitely for alcoholism. However, numerous recent studies designate that physicians in numerous health care settings often do not identify and treat alcoholism (Drake, 2013). These answers underline the need for effective and correct events that will allow clinicians to screen for alcoholism. One of these test are used to do this are the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Established in 1971, the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (MAST) is one of the most accurate and oldest alcohol screening tests accessible, effective in classifying dependent drinkers with up to 98% accuracy.

Purpose for the instrument

It is evident the MAST is considered to be one of the most extensive utilized measures for being able to evaluate alcohol abuse. Usually the measure is somewhere around a 25-item questionnaire that is made in order to give an effective and rapid screening for lifetime alcohol-connected issues and alcoholism. Also, the MAST has been effectively used in a range of locations with diverse populations. When it comes to this evaluation, every one of the MAST screening devices are kept count on a point scale system. (De-Micheli, 2012) As specified on the Project Cork website (ML, 2011)as mentioned earlier, there are 25 questions to the "MAST" screening tool that are used to evaluate the person specifically. Also, the benefits and inadequacies are carefully attached to this screening instrument. All of the questions on the MAST test communicate to the patient's self-appraisal of social, vocational, and family difficulties regularly related with heavy drinking.

Administration

The AUDIT is administered by a paraprofessional or health professional. When it comes to proper administration, training is required. A thorough videotape training and user's manual module explain proper administration, scoring, interpretation, procedures, and clinical management (Clark, 2012). Also, screening is a big part of the administration. Screening is something that can be done right before the session in a waiting area on paper or it can even be done on a computer. Sometimes if needed, it can be done throughout the session on paper or verbally. In either situation, it is the job of the administrator to makes sure that they are allowing time to score and the look over the results. This can even be done during home visits privately. There could be other possibly people present in the home at the time who can listen in on the brief intervention and screening. The administrator will need to be the one to discuss this matter with the client and figure out whether it is an issue, and if so, how to grip it. In all of these settings, providers are usually covered by the confidentiality rules of their parent organization irrespective of the setting.

If they are not enclosed, then a technique must be recognized so that any information shared and recorded is kept personal. Particularly with home visits and public events, this process must ensure a way of keeping any written information connected to the client from being nearby to other individuals until it grasps protected files in the organization.

Examiner's qualifications

Questions on the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test narrate to the patient's self-appraisal of social, vocational, and family difficulties often linked with heavy drinking. The test was advanced to screen for alcohol difficulties in the general population.

Special instruction

The instructions for the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test are usually straight forward. They are asked to select yes or no for each question. Then they are asked to please respond to each item and answer fairly. As far as the instructions is concerned, it also makes the point that if a person is having difficulty with a statement, then they need to choose the response that is typically right.

Clinical application

When it comes to the clinical application of certain interventions intended to provide clinicians serving adult populations in general medical settings with the screening tools like the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test and procedures necessary in order to conduct screening, brief intervention, and/or other treatment referral for patients who may have or be at risk of developing a substance use disorder (Skinner, 2012).

Stuck Writing Your "Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test provides an opportunity for clinicians to intervene early and potentially improve care by raising awareness of the possible impact of substance use on a patient's general health.

Critique of the Instrument

There are just two drawbacks to the MAST test that experts talk about, compared with other alcohol screening tests that are available today. One of those is that the length of the test makes it less appropriate to manage in a busy primary care office or emergency room location, compared to the shorter four- or five-question tests obtainable. The questions on the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test likewise focus on difficulties over the patient's lifetime, instead of on current complications. This means the test is not as likely to notice alcohol difficulties in the initial stages.

Over the years, there have been numerous differences of the MAST developed, as well as the brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test, the short MAST, in addition to the self-administered MAST. The following is the 22-question, self-administered Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (ML, 2011).

Potential for further study

Many screening measures have been established for use in clinical settings such as the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test, as well as primary health care surroundings. There have been some thought-provoking historical developments in this research, which need to be looked into as future studies are calculated. First, numerous screening tests share mutual roots with the CAGE questions and the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. There is an honestly extensive literature on the performance of these evaluations. A second trend has been to develop ever short-lived measures, with numerous single -- item measures now being advertised. Whether these short-term measures will guide to increased screening, permit for feedback to patients, and make available for ideal administration of patients with alcohol use difficulties has yet to be figured out. A final trend has been to highlight consumption pointers either alone or in mixture with other consequence -- founded on or dependence pointers.

Even though these advances in screening measures are important, application appears to be lagging behind the development and assessment of measures. As a result, more attention should be paid to tactics and methods for increasing the use of screening measures in an array of sites.

There are a quantity of important research instructions that should be considered when looking into improving screening for alcohol use problems in clinical settings when using the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Research to date has mostly evaluated screening measures in extremely procedure -- driven, investigator -- controlled type of studies. Also, research staff are often utilized to manage the measures, the scoring is delivered through the study, and the standard measure against which the measure is assessed is likewise directed by the staff. Such studies could be seen as measuring "effectiveness," or inspecting the performance of measures in ideal settings. On the other hand, we know reasonably little in regards to how screening procedures should be used in real -- world clinical backgrounds. Studies are needed to assess the "effectiveness" of screening for alcohol use complications, searching such factors as the timing of screening, who should manage the screen, who would need to translate the results for the patient and clinician, and how the results are to be combined with further management and assessment.

Conclusion

It is obvious that screening for alcohol problems can take place in a wide range of settings and populations. Research does display that a number of good screening instruments such as the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test are obtainable that can be tailored to detailed audiences and needs. Perceiving alcohol abuse and dependence at the first glance in the course of disease allows clinicians to get individuals the assistance they need, either by starting a short-term intervention or by referring the patient to some kind of a treatment. Even patients who do not have an alcohol condition, but who are drinking in ways that are damaging, can benefit from the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test" (2014, November 27) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michigan-alcoholism-screening-test-2153084

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test" 27 November 2014. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michigan-alcoholism-screening-test-2153084>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test", 27 November 2014, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/michigan-alcoholism-screening-test-2153084
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example