Mill and Kant- Morality Immanuel Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1279 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 4

Courage, intelligence for example could be used for wrong purposes and hence it was important pre-requisite to have good will if an action was to be termed moral.

Intelligence, wit, judgment, and the other talents of the mind, however they be named, or courage, resoluteness, and perseverance as qualities of temperament, are doubtless in many respects good and desirable. But they can become extremely bad and harmful if the will, which is to make use of these gifts of nature and which in its special constitution is called character, is not good. (Kant 2: p 9)

John Stuart Mill on the other hand proposed a different theory of morality which stated that an action is right if it promotes happiness of the greatest number of people. In other words, if an action maximizes general happiness then it can be deemed moral. Mill felt that maximization of general happiness was the pre-requisite because "each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness" (Mill qtd. In McCloskey, 61). This was his utilitarian belief and was based on the notion that man's desires his own pleasure. Thus by maximizing the general happiness, he would also be maximizing his own pleasure and since it is not only him benefiting from the action, we can term it moral. Since pleasure, to Mill, was the only goal that man strived to attain with his actions thus morality, "the rules and precepts for human conduct" (Kolak, 834), was also based on this notion. Mill completely rejected Kantian belief that morality occurs when good will is the driving force behind an action. He felt that a moral action should be based on possibility of good consequences and not on good intentions alone.

Stuck Writing Your "Mill and Kant- Morality Immanuel" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Mill and Kant- Morality Immanuel Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



While there are some flaws in both theories, it is Kant's moral law which makes far more sense than Mill's utilitarian idea of morality. For one, man doesn't always act with the goal of maximizing other people's happiness because one some occasions, their happiness might not result in his own pleasure. Suppose a person X loves his job and deserves to be promoted because he is dedicated and hard working, but person Z, Y, T- all his colleagues, do not like him and would be happy if he left the company. In this case, if X resigned, it would result in maximization of other's happiness but would cost him his pleasure. So-then - now will his staying in the firm constitute an immoral action? How would leaving it make it a moral action? Mill's notion of greatest happiness of greatest number of people is thus rather flawed as one critic writes: "Mill here failed to grasp that rational beings often deem it important to act on principles irrespective of the ends to be achieved thereby, or in spite of the consequences" (McCloskey, 59). Kant's theory is based on rationality and actually leads to a choice where people know they can choose to make a right decision and act morally. Mill's idea of maximization of happiness is absurd on various occasions. It doesn't apply to all situations and doesn't give man much room. There are some flaws with Kant's moral theory as well especially with his categorical imperative but it still leaves room for choice and free will which make the while concept rational and applicable.

Works.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Mill And Kant- Morality Immanuel" (2005, May 26) Retrieved May 19, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/mill-kant-morality-immanuel-66508

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Mill And Kant- Morality Immanuel" 26 May 2005. Web.19 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/mill-kant-morality-immanuel-66508>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Mill And Kant- Morality Immanuel", 26 May 2005, Accessed.19 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/mill-kant-morality-immanuel-66508
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example