Moral Reasoning Essay

Total Length: 701 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 2

reasoning that moral reasoning is determining what is right or wrong in a situation is acceptable but confusion arise from understanding what is wrong and what is right. Though universal with intercultural variations, it cannot be argued that it is only based on the perception of right or wrong. As a support to this, it is correct that cultures have varying beliefs and opinions and view moral reasoning differently. In China for example, bowing down to elders is a moral act but in America nobody bows to the elders. Besides, Chinese focus on group welfare which is the opposite for American culture which favors individualism.

Second Response

It is generally acceptable that moral reasoning varies based on people's reasoning and beliefs; this response upholds that morality depends on whether a person's act will harm the other or not which is a rational ideology. This belief is awkward since it is not possible to gauge a person's perception of your actions; whether good or bad that is what is good for you may be bad for the other person.
Though Hindu and American morality concepts are contrasting; the American being more individualistic while Hindu is socialist, they deeply care for parents. In support, it is true that culture shapes people's views concerning moral reasoning. Americans disregard collectivism attitudes which Hindus are great proponents.

Third Response

Determining what is wrong or right based on what you are taught is correct since society shapes our cultural thinking. However, whatever a particular society teaches may not be acceptable to everybody; this argument fails to convince a person why they should be morally upright. As an example, Africans view morality based on biblical teachings the same as Puerto Ricans. In both cultures, morality entails upholding the familial name by displaying good character to avoid tarnishing the family's reputation. Arguing that cultural differences regarding moral reasoning remain unclear is correct requiring further debate and research. Additionally, morality is unrelated to behavior despite the influence culture has on an individual's belief of morality; this argument is definitely correct and non-debatable.

Fourth Response

As a person….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Arguments for and Against Physician Assisted Suicide

but not all, arguments against physician-assisted suicide are based on moral reasoning. Those that are based on morality refer to the presumed sanctity of life, the belief that “purposefully helping a patient die is categorically wrong under any circumstances,”and the corollary that the role of the physician or healthcare worker is as healer (Quill & Sussman, 2018). A physician who believes that the ultimate objective of the profession is to preserve life will therefore believe that physician-assisted death is wrong and would instead ask that the patient use other methods to alleviate suffering. For example, Appelbaum (2016) claims that physicians… Continue Reading...

Business Ethics Practices Compliance Auditing

account is one way organizations can shift their moral reasoning to better reflect the mission, vision, and values purportedly embedded in the company’s ethical code (Mason & Simmons, 2013). Corporate social responsibility and environmental responsibility are both becoming strategic business practices that improve relationships with stakeholders by demonstrating respect. Research shows how businesses demonstrating openness to change, flexibility and adaptability, and an ongoing commitment to innovation are in a position uniquely situated to promote environmental sustainability at all levels of business practice (Pedersen, Gwordz & Hvass, 2016). Stakeholders may also respond to ethical decisions by altering their own… Continue Reading...

Cognitive and Behavioral Development of an Adolescent

independence just as adolescents become experimenters in their lives. Piaget proposed a theory of development where moral reasoning for children develops from what he calls a naive understanding of morality. This naive understanding is usually based on behavior and outcomes. However, as they develop, they can have a more advanced understanding that is based on intentions. This means that Riley is using his independence in the wrong way. The identity crisis as described in the theories of development is a serious issue that he is facing. As a football player, he interacts with the other adolescents and conforms to some of the activities that they undertake,… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Moral Reasoning" (2013, January 12) Retrieved April 29, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/moral-reasoning-104730

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Moral Reasoning" 12 January 2013. Web.29 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/moral-reasoning-104730>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Moral Reasoning", 12 January 2013, Accessed.29 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/moral-reasoning-104730