Nature of Evil Essay

Total Length: 683 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 2

Moltmann and Pannenberg

Comparing and Contrasting theologies of Moltmann and Pannenberg

Comparing and contrasting theologies of Jurgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg:

The nature of evil

How is it possible for God to be good in a world full of evil? This is one of the most essential questions all theologians grapple with, including Jurgen Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg. Although there are similarities between both thinkers, according to Kane (2005), both theologians have fundamentally different points-of-view of human freedom. For Pannenberg, all human beings have the freedom to fulfill their human destiny in a positive or a negative fashion. "The ability to decide among possibilities of conduct is a high form of creaturely independence," but true freedom finds its fullest expression in the Trinity (Kane 2005: 41). Furthermore, although the creation may manifest imperfections, this is not a reflection upon God, who remains separate from his creations which are given free will and agency to choose evil (Kane 2005: 42). In other words, if there is evil in the world, it is because of human origins, not because of God's imperfection. God could not give His creation all of is infinite wisdom and perfection without making the creation a rival God, hence the existence of evil in the world.
"If the creator willed a world of finite creatures and their independence, then he had to accept their corruptibility and suffering and the possibility of evil as a result of their striving for their own autonomy" (Kane 2005:42).

In contrast, Moltmann suggests that suffering is a reality and suffering is an opportunity to understand God better. He acknowledges the challenge of believing in a good God given a world full of suffering innocents. But Moltmann points out that even God in the form of Jesus cries out against the injustice of suffering, indicating God's own awareness of this problem. "Although Jesus went willingly…he did not suffer passively…he cried out 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?' (Mk. 15:34)." (Kane 2005: 44).

Despite these divergences in their emphasis, there are still common, resonant themes between the two theologians. Both "point to a future that for atheism is an impossibility: a good future without suffering" in the form of the future Kingdom of God (Kane 2005: 45). Although suffering may exist in this imperfect world given humanity's imperfection, God ultimately offers the promise of eternal redemption from suffering. Through resurrection in a….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Reflection and Research Essay on Augustine: Saint Augustine on Evil

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.] The nature of evil can be explained by the nature of the mind. People’s mind is often preoccupied with a lustful appetite to do evil. Therefore, evil is a state of the mind of people. When an individual is preoccupied with thoughts of his selfish ambitions and is hence determined to achieve such ambitions through any action regardless of its impact to injure another person, then such selfish ambitions become evil[footnoteRef:10]. Therefore, the evilness of an action is characterized by the intentions of such actions as well as the disregard of… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Nature Of Evil" (2015, February 15) Retrieved May 9, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/nature-evil-2148846

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Nature Of Evil" 15 February 2015. Web.9 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/nature-evil-2148846>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Nature Of Evil", 15 February 2015, Accessed.9 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/nature-evil-2148846