One War Essay

Total Length: 788 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

packet primary source documents drawn historical periods covered chapters 18-21 Give Me

The historical situation that produced this primary source written by John Reed in April of 1917, "Whose War" was America's imminent participation in World War I. It is noteworthy that the author alludes to the two factors that most readily led to America's involvement in this martial affair -- the Zimmerman Telegram (which he refers to twice as the "note") and the sinking of United States ships enacted by German submarines. There certainly appears to be a bias in evaluating the context of this source -- Reed was considered a "radical" and is definitely anti-war at a time in which patriotism and support for war was exceedingly high. Thus, this source reads like a piece of journalism that was written to attempt to alert people to the incongruence and atrocities associated with America's impending actions.

The author's major point in writing this document is to convey the fact that American involvement in World War I will ultimately be detrimental to the country and to the vast quantities of people who live within it. Thus, he has included the rhetorical question in the title of the document, and his assertion that it is not "my" war, nor "our" war. The "our" he is referring to, of course, are the vast majority of Americans who will be exploited in this martial encounter.
These include those individuals who will kill and be killed for others on the front lines, despite the fact that they will not be "paid a living war." It also includes the severe limitation of civil liberties, which are manifest in a variety of ways, perhaps most colorfully in the fact that war results in "poor men sent to jail for long terms without trial, and even without any change. Peaceful strikers, and their wives and children, have been shot to death, burned to death…."

Additionally, the author's principle point includes the fact that there are vast amounts of hypocrisy associated with the war, and an imbalance in the socio-economic results of such belligerence. In terms of hypocrisy, the author addresses the fact that the media is attempting to portray the Allies and the U.S. (which has been sending a great deal of monetary support and supplies to them) as so-called 'good guys', despite the fact that they are just….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

The Things They Carried by Tim OBrien

It is a hotly contested idea that just one war-themed book can adequately discuss the topic of Vietnam, and this idea is properly portrayed in this book. Fellow authors like Renny Christopher have condemned Tim O'Brien's story for paying more attention to the misery of the American soldiers and less interest in the Vietnamese. However, the core of "The Things They Carried," O'Brien's work is distinct. Another author, Heberle, who wrote "A Trauma Artist," based his work on how aggression has impacted on American politics, society and culture. Similarly, O'Brien's work also focuses on the distressing experiences endured… Continue Reading...

Drone Strikes and Politics in Movies

1). Drones enable targeted man hunting on a scale never before possible in military history. Drone warfare is based on the principle of remote agency. The psychological and even spiritual distance placed between drone operator and target may be meaningful from an ethical as well as pragmatic perspective. As Asaro suggests, drone operators have been extricated from their military positions and placed within a professional configuration. Drone operators have "professionalized careers and technological systems of supervision and management" qualitatively different from their military counterparts (Asaro 196). Whether these changes are beneficial or ethical remains to be seen, but those types of judgments also depend on… Continue Reading...

Eye in The Sky Film

drone warfare's ethics is risky since it disregards and conceals ethical questions that are much more pertinent. Instead of considering whether to murder one guiltless individual in order to save 80 persons, think of the morals of murdering many innocent people so as to kill a single guilty person. A report released by Reprieve established that as many as 1147 people might have been killed by the U.S. Coalition while trying to kill 41 men who were on their hit list. For instance, 221 people including 103 children were killed… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"One War" (2014, March 30) Retrieved July 5, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/one-war-186359

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"One War" 30 March 2014. Web.5 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/one-war-186359>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"One War", 30 March 2014, Accessed.5 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/one-war-186359