Operation Anaconda Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1077 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 4

Case Study: Operation AnacondaThe U.S. military initiated operation Anaconda to vacate the enemy, Al Qaeda, and Taliban, from Shahikot valley in Afghanistan in March 2002 (Kugler, 2007). The launch was planned with a complex approach that involved the ‘hammer and anvil’ technique for eliminating the enemy from Afghani land. The mission was considered the U.S. army killed a success as hundreds of enemy fighters whereas only 50 U.S. army men were injured and a mere eight men were killed. Much credit was given to the deployment of joint operations and modern information networks utilized for this mission. However, this paper aims at analytically analyzing the seven principles of mission command pertinent to Operation Anaconda.The seven principles of mission command inculcate mutual trust, shared understanding, mission orders, commander’s intent, disciplined initiative, competence, and risk acceptance (Nilsson, 2020). The first principle, mutual trust, is the foundational principle for building a team that should be courageous enough to fight the enemy on the battleground. It is the degree of confidence and dependability that team members have that strengthen them internally to be better equipped with the required commitment to fight. The commitment that soldiers of Operation Anaconda from the U.S. side showed in their mission was seen as trust in their leaders and within their abilities. For instance, when the intelligence estimates were given to the U.S. officials that the enemy fighters could be 200-300 in number with light weapons instead of 1000, the officials trusted their guesses and contemplated upon their further actions of the plan to attack the enemy fighters by keeping in mind that fewer or no damages should be inflicted on the residing population (Kugler, 2007, p. 6). However, later, the initial intelligence guestimates were wrong as the heavily armed enemy fighters were 700-1000 in numbers.

Stuck Writing Your "Operation Anaconda" Case Study?

View All Our Example Operation Anaconda Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

With their resilience and trust in their skillfulness, the change in plan and actions turned the tables on the Taliban.Another principle, shared understanding, was present in Operation Anaconda fighters since they knew the operational environment and the purpose they were teamed up. The contingency planning and the knowledge of the area, such as narrow pathways of the mountains, the exit routes if the enemy attacked them suddenly with force, and soil structure of the mountain, whether they are slippery or strong and sturdy for running, were to be deployed for the mission. The intelligence guesses were initially faulty since they plentifully relied on the friendliness of the Afghan troops who were supposed to act as the U.S. army’s allies. The Taliban fighters were positioned along the ridgelines of the mountains with all the heavy machinery for fighting. The U.S. army had a shrewd sense of planning for critical contingencies that helped control the situation when in the combat zone so that innocent civilians should not be hurt.The mission orders are to be followed by the troops to achieve the desired results. The U.S. army already set the priorities by devising the name of the mission, ‘Anaconda,’ whose aim was to coil around its victim to crush it, as the Anaconda snake does (Kugler, 2007, p. 10). Similarly, when on 20th February, General Hagenback issued his formal orders for the mission, they were to be obeyed by the subordinates by allocating the resources….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Operation Anaconda

Appraisal of Operation Anaconda Kugler (2007) states that Operation Anaconda was the first large-scale battle to be carried out as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, which incorporated joint efforts between Special Forces and multinational partners. These forces worked together in Shahi Kot Vallley in Afghanistan in 2002. The battle took place in a rugged mountainous terrain with extremely complex circumstances for the soldiers. In addition to the complex terrain, the soldiers also experienced numerous challenges that contributed to the failure of the mission. Since then, Operation Anaconda has been used to provide… Continue Reading...

Joint Function As Related to Operation Anaconda

each function has its own role to play it cannot be used in isolation of the others. The operation Anaconda demonstrates how each of the functions was used to support each other in order to accomplish the mission. The success of the operation was mainly due to the commanders recognizing and acting on the information received (Fleri, Howard, Hukill, & Searle, 2003). Without reinforcements from the other functions, it would not have been possible for the operation to succeed. The paper analyzes the 6-warfighting functions and offers information on how it reinforces and complements the other functions. Looking from the perspective of the operation Anaconda, each function is… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Operation Anaconda" (2021, June 02) Retrieved May 18, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/operation-anaconda-2176281

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Operation Anaconda" 02 June 2021. Web.18 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/operation-anaconda-2176281>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Operation Anaconda", 02 June 2021, Accessed.18 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/operation-anaconda-2176281
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example