Oregon Death With Dignity Act Term Paper

Total Length: 1388 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 5



Thus the choice is not "save money by allowing patients to die." The choice is, rather, "allow patients to die rather than taking heroic measures, and redeploy these scarce resources to improve overall healthcare, quality of life and lifespan."

Nurses are required, as one of the 9 conditions of their oath, to triage and rationalize the giving of healthcare. If an ER nurse, for example, has a series of patients with whom she can only deal one at a time, he/she must make the 'triage' decision to focus on the patient who can benefit from his/her care the most.

That means that not all patients can receive the same level of care.

Lost in the debate about Oregon's "right to die" legislation is that the State of Oregon also embarked on a thoroughgoing analysis of healthcare rationing. The state disallowed a number of categories of medical treatment, and cut back on a number of other such methods, in order to free up resources to focus on the sicker patients. The overall goal was to support procedures and the use of resources in such a way that healthcare was enhanced. The right-to-die legislation was part and parcel of this overall effort. Those backing the legislation in the State understood that heroic expenditures at the end of life were not only futile, but they diverted scarce resources from other areas where the patients could be better-helped.

The better way to present the ethical dilemma is as follows: "Does it make more sense to invest in preventative healthcare, for everything from nosocomial infections and breast cancer to prostate cancer and diabetes, or does it make more sense to spend those resources on prolonging dying patients' lives in hospital beds for a few days or weeks, particularly if the patients would not choose to go on living?"

Americans are changing their attitudes towards death and dying, which may augur well in other states for right-to-die legislation (Journal, 1981).
What is less likely to change in the short-term is our medical system's attitude towards intervention. American physicians are much more likely to perform hysterectomies, cardiac catheterization, cardiac bypass operations, hip replacements and many other procedures than their European, Canadian and Japanese counterparts (NEJM Editorial, 1994).

Part of the reason for this lies in the reimbursement system: the more lucrative procedures for hospitals and physicians include cardiac intervention, cancer treatment and orthopedics. But another part of the rationale comes from the American attitude towards "doing something" as opposed to doing nothing, watchful waiting, or acceptance of the inevitable course for the patient.

How much of the push towards expensive intervention comes from the healthcare institution and the physician? While many more patients are making their own healthcare decisions, preparing Living Wills, and taking a more active role in understanding their options, many patients and their families nonetheless rely on the physicians for the opinion on what to do. "If it were your mother, Doctor, what would you do?" Asked of a surgeon, it is doubtful that the answer would be "watchful waiting," at least in the United States.

To a degree, cultural inclinations in other countries are conditioned by, and tailored to, the reimbursement systems in those countries. In addition, less restrictive court systems make it easier for physicians not to "take every measure" to prolong life when such measures would not be helpful to the patient......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Oregon Death With Dignity Act" (2007, October 26) Retrieved April 30, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/oregon-death-dignity-act-34856

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Oregon Death With Dignity Act" 26 October 2007. Web.30 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/oregon-death-dignity-act-34856>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Oregon Death With Dignity Act", 26 October 2007, Accessed.30 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/oregon-death-dignity-act-34856