Organizational Structure and Students Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1522 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 5

Lens One: Structural Theories

Organizational structure refers to how work activities or tasks are divided, and how relationships are established and maintained (Corlett, n.d.). Bureaucratic organizations are structured formally and may result in a pyramidal shape with the bulk of employees at the bottom with the least amount of decision-making power (Corlett, n.d.). The bureaucratic organization can also take on the image of a machine (Morgan, 1998). Morgan (1998) adds that structural theories offer precision in the design and implementation of organizational details. For example, the work of teachers is highly formalized down to the details of lesson plans and the measurable outcomes in terms of test scores. A core goal of a mechanistic, bureaucratic organization is predictability. The machine image also demonstrates the ways an organization emphasizes speed, clarity, and efficiency. Structural theories illustrate how educators participate in chains of command, and there are legal and contractual bases of formal authority. For instance, teachers are not allowed to make executive decisions regarding the budgets for their schools or to address the needs of students like James. Teachers are constrained by the organizational structure in which they work, which mechanizes all actions and decisions.

While the highly mechanical organization encourages accountability through clear chains of command and strict role differentiation, the problems with David Woods Elementary school are at least in part attributable to the organizational structure. For one, too much centralized power reduces the role educators can play in the lives of students like James. Second, the lines of accountability and responsibility for educators are becoming blurred as teachers are expected to fulfill many different roles at the same time. Teachers are expected to maintain discipline in the classroom, teach to common core standards, and address the special needs of their individual students with little institutional support.

Lens Two: Systems Theories

According to Corlett (n.d.), there are four general themes related to systems theories of organizations. One theme is productive processes. In an educational organization, the productive processes focus on measurable student outcomes such as rates of graduation or grades. A second theme of systems theory as it pertains to organizations is energizing processes, which refer to the role of the organization in its environment or social context.

Stuck Writing Your "Organizational Structure and Students" Case Study?

View All Our Example Organizational Structure and Students Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

For example, a school plays a distinct role in its local community just as education plays a major role in a society's economic and social landscape. Enabling processes are a third theme of systems theory. These are the processes that ensure checks and balances within the system. In a school like David Woods, administrators provide support services for teachers, who in turn provide ongoing feedback to administrators. Finally, systems theory demonstrates the developing processes that provide for all stakeholders. In an educational organization, the stakeholders may include parents as well as students. Morgan (1998) shows how systems theory essentially describes organizations as organisms. In an organism like a school, each part is requisite for the functioning of the whole.

Just as an organism is sensitive to environmental stimuli and external issues, an organization is also going to react to changes or stressors in its environment. According to Boyne & Meier (2009), a "turbulent external environment is widely believed to have damaging effects on public service performance," (p. 799). In fact, a turbulent external environment has a negative impact on performance measures (Boyne & Meier, 2009). In the school environment, external turbulence such as unstable home environments, poverty, and other external stressors will have a notable impact on individual student performance outcomes. External turbulence will also have an effect on the overall performance outcomes for the entire student body and for teachers, too. The additional stress that comes from addressing the emotional and mental health needs of students like James creates "volatility" in the school organism, according to the lens of systems theory (Boyne & Meier, 2009, p. 799). In addition to the stability versus turbulence measures, it is also possible to rate school performance on measures like diversity versus homogeneity, clustering versus randomness, and scarcity versus munificence. Diversity will help David Woods Elementary administrators and educators better address the needs of their students, whereas homogeneity will reduce the resilience of the school programs.

Lens Three: Culture Theories

Morgan (1998) offers the metaphor of the village as another lens for viewing organizations like David Woods….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Organizational Structure And Students" (2016, August 11) Retrieved May 12, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/organizational-structure-students-2161866

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Organizational Structure And Students" 11 August 2016. Web.12 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/organizational-structure-students-2161866>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Organizational Structure And Students", 11 August 2016, Accessed.12 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/organizational-structure-students-2161866
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example