Paradise Lost Term Paper

Total Length: 858 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Paradise Lost Book II begins with the assembled devils holding their council in Hell. It begins with a general address by Satan, who says "I give not Heav'n for lost" (II.14). In other words, Satan considers war against God to still be a possibility, and he begins the discussion by asking whether the war should be an outright attempt to take Heaven, or whether it should be conducted, surreptitiously, as a guerilla-style or espionage campaign: "by what best way, / whether of open Warr or covert guile, / we now debate" (II.40-2). What follows are four arguments from four of the chief devils under Satan's rule in Hell -- Moloch, Belial, Mammon and Beelzebub. These are easily summarized.

Moloch speaks first, on behalf of an outright attack on God: "My sentence is for open Warr" (51). Moloch's argument concentrates on their present situation in Hell: "what can be worse / Then to dwell here… " (85-6). Moloch cannot imagine that God's punishment for open war could be worse than Hell: the only worse punishment God could devise is their death or nonexistence, which is nothing to fear. "More destroy'd then thus / We should be quite abolisht and expire. / What fear we then?" (92-4). Moloch is aware that God's omnipotence means the devils will probably lose an open war, but if they cannot achieve "Victory" they can definitely attain "Revenge" (105).


As in a formal debate, Belial speaks next and takes the opposing view: he finds Moloch's "main reason to persuade immediate Warr" is also the best argument to avoid such war. Any "revenge" they could accomplish would hardly trouble or harm God Himself, and thus the devils are in the paradoxical position of having to provoke God sufficiently that he will destroy them completely: "that must be our cure / to be no more" (145-6). Then Belial states the case for preferring to exist, even in this fallen state: "who would loose, / though full of pain, this intellectual being / these thoughts that wander through eternity" (146-8). Belial's intellectual nature also means that he states the most obvious point: open war or guerilla war or espionage are all the same, when your opponent is omniscient. "What can force or guile / With him, or who deceive his mind, whose eye / Views all things at one view?" (188-90). Belial thinks that in time God may ultimately relent in his punishment of the devils, "satisfi'd / with what is punish't" (212-3). Or else in time Hell will come to seem less unpleasant to the devils, "this horror….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Man Vs God in Frankenstein

learns of from interacting with the epic poem Paradise Lost. Thus, the monster and Victor are in conflict with one another—just as Milton’s Satan was in conflict with his creator. However, the characters do undergo changes: Victor regains his humanity after losing his love to the monster (who kills Victor’s bride), and the monster becomes introspective once more. Their mutual destruction in the icy wilderness reflects their sameness and the manner in which their conflict actually unites them in a dreary, cold, bleakness, where warmth, humanity and love have no place. This paper will show Victor and his… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Paradise Lost" (2012, March 26) Retrieved May 12, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/paradise-lost-113480

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Paradise Lost" 26 March 2012. Web.12 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/paradise-lost-113480>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Paradise Lost", 26 March 2012, Accessed.12 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/paradise-lost-113480