Peer Reviews of an SRS Term Paper

Total Length: 389 words ( 1 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

SRS and code systems

Criticisms from one's respected peers can often hurt more than criticisms from laypeople or new users of a software system. One assumes that one's fellow professionals can make a more reasoned, if not necessarily more objective critique. However, personal differences can enter the fray of even the most objective peer review and thus affect the constructive nature of the criticism.

To ensure objectivity, it is important that individuals address their differences with particular elements in relation to the system being reviewed, not to the person. For instance, don't say, 'you didn't do a good job on this,' speak about the system or code under critique.
Specifics are key, rather than saying, 'I don't think that works,' say what the potential problems arise when the system is used and try to give a constructive, concrete solution how one could possibly reform it and make it better. "However you choose to do it, some kind of public praising and commendation seems to help build the spirit of striving for excellence that we all want in our teams," notes one developer. (Wiegers, 1994) If at all possible, for every criticism, also….....

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Peer Reviews Of An SRS" (2005, February 15) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/peer-reviews-srs-61861

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Peer Reviews Of An SRS" 15 February 2005. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/peer-reviews-srs-61861>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Peer Reviews Of An SRS", 15 February 2005, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/peer-reviews-srs-61861