Permanent Elimination of the Estate Term Paper

Total Length: 2094 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 10

Page 1 of 7

It falls on savers, not spenders;

3) Early and naive advocates of death taxes thought that such taxes would not distort behavior because they fell only on wealth that decedents left behind by accident. Now very strong evidence supports the common-sense idea that people are strongly motivated to leave wealth to their heirs. Death taxes distort the behavior and investment decisions of this important class of "intergenerational" savers;

Not only does the income tax not need a "backstop," the income tax is actually a bad tax precisely because it falls on savings, in effect double taxing saving as opposed to immediate consumption. Death taxes compound the error by adding a third tax on savings. A fair tax system should consistently tax spending, not work or savings, and should use progressive rates to meet whatever liberal or redistributive objectives it has;

Death taxes have not contributed to greater equality in America. In fact, the death tax has so many gaps, loopholes, and problems -- and the motivation to pass on wealth to heirs is so strong -- that the current death tax allows precisely the kind of wealth transmission it is designed to prevent or limit;

The tax is an extremely costly, cumbersome, and indirect way to assist charities. Charitable giving can be helped or subsidized within the constraints of any tax system, so the unfair and inefficient death tax is not needed for that end." (McCafferey, 1999)

SUMMARY and CONCLUSION

While the estate tax is in terms of economics inefficient in nature resulting in distortion to decisions in economics and while this tax results in depression of capital stock and results in less-long run growth this tax has driven charitable contributions noted by NBC Evening News on December 19, 2007 to be down by 50% for the 2007 Christmas season.

Stuck Writing Your "Permanent Elimination of the Estate" Term Paper?

While the tax is costly imposing large costs of compliance both publicly and privately and is extremely difficult to enforce and while the tax further drives consumerism and does not provide a framework for savings at the same time many individuals benefits from donated money through grants and government funding initiatives which is donated by those subject to this type of taxation. The bottom line is that this tax is inequitable in that the tax falls upon the shoulders of the wrong individuals taxing those who manage to save instead of those who are the spenders. The estate tax greatly supports and discourages the very elements that a tax system which is sound in nature should encourage which are "works, savings, thrift, and intergenerational altruism..." (McCafferey, 2007).....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Permanent Elimination Of The Estate" (2007, December 19) Retrieved June 30, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/permanent-elimination-estate-33144

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Permanent Elimination Of The Estate" 19 December 2007. Web.30 June. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/permanent-elimination-estate-33144>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Permanent Elimination Of The Estate", 19 December 2007, Accessed.30 June. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/permanent-elimination-estate-33144