Person Identity Essay

Total Length: 1053 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 4

Person Identity

Weirob believes that she is only her body because her identity is uniquely tied to it. Her body is what has experienced (i.e., seen, smelt, tasted, felt, etc.) the world; it is that to which she has attachment. Her body is the only constant in all of the arguments of identity. She was unconvinced by appeals to theories of identity tied to souls (which are unknowable, she argues) or memory (which, she says, is fallacious and must be actual to even be relevant). She believes that she must be able to anticipate the feelings of a future self, that self must be intrinsically significant (i.e., her identity is not dependent on outside forces, such as the creation of two of her via God's will), and her memories must be real (and not fabricated or otherwise not directly related to the actual experiences that caused the memories in the first place). Because only the body-identity theory meets these criteria, she believes that she is wholly her body.

However, I do not agree that sameness of body is all there is to personal identity. I find the memory arguments more compelling than Weirob. There might also be more to the "person-stages" than Weirob was willing to concede; I also think that there is less to the body-identity theory. The body is the vessel by which the identity is carried, and Julia North case was probably actually Julia. I understand that she (Julia in the body of Mary Frances) could be seen as a delusional Mary Frances, but the fact that person could remember and explain events that did not happen to her (and in fact did happen the a part of her) is significant.
Further, there is a causal relationship between the events and the memory (i.e., there is a direct, traceable line of events that goes back from the event to Julia currently). These events are not only explainable but also understandable.

I will give an example. Right before the accident, Julia might have had a chocolate ice cream that she paid for with money given to her that morning by her mother for washing the dishes. Julia's brain moved her arms to wash the dishes because she knew that she would get the money and would be able to buy the ice cream. The body, then, was a vehicle, a machine that the brain uses. That same brain (regardless of having been seen or felt, as per Weirob's argument) is now in a different vehicle, Mary Frances' body, by way of surgery. It still remembers having that ice cream, and it still is the same brain that moved that last body to get the reward. It is the brain that had been taught to act that way. I would not be so quick to say that because I am change cars, I am not the same driver. The ability to change bodies may be rare, but if possible, does not seem to indicate a change of person or identity.

Further, in argument with Weirob, I would wonder where and when the body stops being the body (and therefore one stops being herself). For example,….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Person Identity" (2011, May 10) Retrieved June 13, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/person-identity-119046

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Person Identity" 10 May 2011. Web.13 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/person-identity-119046>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Person Identity", 10 May 2011, Accessed.13 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/person-identity-119046