Philosophies of Aristotle and Thomas Essay

Total Length: 1517 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 5

Says Hobbes, "Another doctrine repugnant to Civil Society is that whatsoever a man does against his Conscience is Sin; and it depends on the presumption of making himself judge of Good and Evil" (Hobbes, p. 234). Hobbes asserts that the civil law is the public conscience, and that even if an individual believes he sins against his own conscience, but does not in actuality violate civil law, that individual is not at fault. Here, Hobbes places the Civil Law and the Commonwealth on a higher plane of morality -- one which oversees all actions, and judges them as though it were somehow superior to them.

In conclusion, both Aristotle and Hobbes formulate complex philosophical systems by which men might live. While both assert a logical desire for the common good, their judgment of what constitutes that good is different.
Aristotle, while allowing for subjective considerations, acknowledges an objective standard by which men might judge (and which can be attained by reason). Hobbes, however, is more rooted in the subjective opinions and agreements that men make in their time and place.

Works.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Philosophies Of Aristotle And Thomas" (2011, April 07) Retrieved May 15, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/philosophies-aristotle-thomas-13135

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Philosophies Of Aristotle And Thomas" 07 April 2011. Web.15 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/philosophies-aristotle-thomas-13135>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Philosophies Of Aristotle And Thomas", 07 April 2011, Accessed.15 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/philosophies-aristotle-thomas-13135