Political Philosophy Term Paper

Total Length: 3021 words ( 10 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 10

Political Philosophy

The purpose of the present paper is to compare and contrast the following books: On Liberty, written by John Stuart Mill in 1859 and The manifesto of the communist party, written by Marx and Engels in 1848. The first part of the paper will describe and analyze the political ideas included in each of the books. The second part will be an attempt to evaluate some of the positive and negative aspects. The third part will compare some of the most relevant political ideas in the two books.

Just like the title of the books suggests it, the main argument discussed by John Stuart Mill is that of freedom. The concept is discussed in the context in which people are organized in a community called society and create complex relations and relationships.

The philosopher addresses the concept of will at individual level, but also analyzes its implications for the entire society. Some of the touched aspects refer to the freedom of speech, free trade and the extent to which the government should be allowed to interfere with the actions of the people. From this point-of-view it is safe to say that the book provides us with a very interesting perspective upon what the state as an instrument is supposed to be.

The main thesis that Mill supports is that freedom is a sacred right that people are born with "The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it." (Mill 2009)

This means that all the people must respect it and protect it, while the government must d everything it to guarantee and protect it. It is important to mention the fact that the issue changes according to the level of development of the society that is under discussion. In some barbaric societies he thinks, it is better to use the force as a means of controlling people, if this is in the best interest of everybody. (Mill 2009) In the more evolved societies, where people are most likely to obey rules of behaviour dictated by reason and morality, it is better to favour absolute freedom while making sure that nobody gets hurt in the process.

There are several important aspects to be underlined. The first one refers to the connection between freedom and morality. In Mill's opinion, absolute freedom must be guaranteed to the people because this is the right thing to do. Why is this the right thing to do? Not only because people are born free, but also allowing people to express themselves and act freely is a means of achieving a good life (and that is our ultimate goal).

A second aspect refers to the morality principles being respected by all the people. All the human beings want to be happy. The philosopher believes that we should be given all the opportunities to act according to our beliefs in order to achieve this happiness, but without harming the others in the process.

We can see how strongly democratic his view is. On the one hand all people are equal and must enjoy the same rights. On the other hand each individual must respect the other one.

Mill thinks that individual freedom is absolute as long as it does not interfere with the well being of the others. From this point-of-view it can be stated that the concept of well being of the other and of society in general is what limits individual freedom. Therefore, freedom fundamentally is the absolute power one has upon himself.

What is the role of the government in this entire affair? The main function that it must realize is that f seeing that all the citizens respect this principle. One must not interfere with the well being of the other. If he does, he is punished. The purpose is that of preventing harm from being done.

A very interesting question arises: if the resources are limited, can the state really guarantee freedom for everybody and well being as well? The general goal is that of achieving the well being of society. What happens when the well being of society as a general mechanism is harmful for one or more individuals? This is a question which still remains open for debate.

Another role that the state has is that of educating people. Mill believes that it is better to prevent than to cure. The best thing that the state can do is make sure that children grow up with strong moral values and with a relevant capacity of objective thinking.
The state must not tell people what to do, but must help them understand on their own what is the right thing to do.

From this point-of-view, the government is an instrument of justice. Once the human being has formed his beliefs and values, the state can no longer tell him what is right or wrong, he must decide on his own.

The philosopher believes that we have absolute freedom upon ourselves. A very interesting ethic question arises: if I have absolute power upon myself, can I also destroy myself? The answer is obviously yes. But what would happen if an important number of people decided they wanted to harm themselves (through suicide or through decay induced by the use of drugs, etc.)?

This would naturally harm society as a whole and have long-term negative consequences upon the others as well. what this means is that there is a strong possibility for the actions which apparently concern ourselves only to affect others as well. The private sphere is sacred and nobody can touch it. From this point-of-view, the highest responsibility seems to belong to the individual.

A further important implication is the religious one. If we are entitled to do anything with ourselves, what is the role of god and the church in all of this? If I can do anything I please with myself then I become my own god. Religion has little place I this discussion. But Mill states there has been such a strong correction regarding the religious freedom in time that the point becomes useless. The moral dimension is maintained in an ideal awareness of the principles of justice and them being respected (either because one believes in them or because he is afraid by the punishment.)

A further interesting aspect refers to the relation between the majority and the minority. According to Mill, the truth is not to be necessarily found in the opinion of the majority. In other words, numbers don't count when truth is concerned. Under these circumstances he encourages all the people to express themselves and openly state their opinion. (Mill 2009)

The direct implication regards the freedom of the press. According to Mill, all the people should have a voice regardless of whether they are right or not. The more conflict there is reading an issue, the better the chances of development.

The role of the state is to guarantee the freedom of speech of the minorities "Everything must be free to be written and published without restraint." (Mill 2009) This is an engine for evolution. Society tends to favour uniformity, but according to the philosopher, it is better to stand out and have the courage to express your own opinion instead of adopting a general opinion just to be liked and accepted by other people.

As far as the freedom of trade is concerned, Mill believed that the state must regulate the acts of commerce, imposing taxes on the goods which are not essential for survival rather than on everything "Trade is a social act." (Mill 2009) He admits that the harm principle can not always function in the filed of commerce. When one wins this implies that there is somebody who looses. The market would not be able to function otherwise.

The role of the government must not the one of major importance in society. The power should belong to the people and not to a central organ which could decide what people are supposed to do. In other words, the government is supposed to advise people and suggest what the rightful actions are and not impose anything a priori. Good citizens would allow this mechanism to function perfectly. It is perhaps a much too idealistic approach to the real world.

The second book under discussion is represented by "The manifesto of the communist party" written by the philosophers Marx and Engels. Its main theme regards the evolution of society throughout history through that which they call class struggle.

According to the authors, society has always been divided between those who had more and those who had less. In other words, people have always been organized in groups according to their incomes. These incomes determined their interests and therefore their actions. The relation between these two groups has always been an antagonistic one. Those who had less always wanted to take the place….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Justice Ethics and Political Philosophy Rawls

.....ethics cannot avoid claims to universal truths, political philosophy cannot avoid the efficacy of universalism. Relativism is too convenient a response to resolving conflicts of interest and divergent views of governance. However, an alternative to the universalism versus relativism debate lies in Rawl's concept of justice as being the fundamental tenet of a constitutional democracy. Rawls also bases his concept of justice and political philosophy on the underlying importance of consensus (Baier, 1989). Interestingly, consensus implies a utilitarian ethical framework, which Rawls (1985) claims to move away from: "as a practical political matter no general moral conception… Continue Reading...

Political Beliefs Personal Reflection

foundation of conservative political philosophy. People need to be motivated by a deep inner drive to do good. The government cannot impose a set of morals or values, although the government does exist to prevent me from infringing on your rights or you from infringing on mine in an egregious way. Through his research in economics, Brooks came to the conclusion that free enterprise and capitalism do drive happiness—contrary to what socialists and many more moderate liberals believe. Michael Tanner also understands the principle of… Continue Reading...

Hegel, Heidegger, and Nietzsche on Philosophy

Revolution expressed and institutionalized new ideas about Reason (literally deified by the Revolution) as well as socio-political philosophy regarding fraternity, equality and liberty. Hegel came to maturity during this era and for him, philosophy consisted of a clash of forces -- and the old world concept of philosophy (the love of knowledge/wisdom) was what Hegel sought to transform in The Phenomenology of Spirit, as he clearly states in the book's Preface: "To help to bring philosophy nearer to the form of science -- that goal where it can lay aside the name of love of knowledge and be actual knowledge -- that is what I have… Continue Reading...

Locke Vs Hume on Consent

is probably a dictatorship or something similar [footnoteRef:1]. [1: Tuckness, Alex. 2017. "Locke's Political Philosophy." plato.stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/#ConPolOblEndGov.] Hume Hume took a rather different approach to consent. One example is when it comes to where someone calls their residence. Even if the moral significance of a residence area is known to all, there are some cases where it would not be free and voluntary. This is no small thing to many given that direct and free consent is seemingly necessary in a society. Hume, in one of his works, gave the example that a poor peasant or artisan cannot just pick up and move… Continue Reading...

John Stuart Mills On Liberty

Political Philosophy II: Theories of Freedom John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is one of the foundational defenses of liberal, democratic government. According to Mill, there are certain core principles "that should regulate how governments and societies, whether democratic or not, can restrict individual liberties."[footnoteRef:1] Mill wrote that regardless of whether a monarch, dictator, or even a democratic majority governed, the only reason to deprive others of their liberties was what he called the harm principle, namely, that "a harm, an action must be injurious or set back important interests of… Continue Reading...

The Declaration of Independence and Freedom

political philosophy became so important. What gave people their “freedom,” however, was still debated. The nature of freedom in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was considered a natural right in some cases and a divine right in others. For example, when it was useful, people appealed to the idea of a Creator endowing people with certain “unalienable rights” and when nature was viewed as the source of life, the rights of man were considered something that just was. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen shows how… Continue Reading...

How Democracy Leads to Tyranny

Political Philosophy II: Theories of Freedom To answer the questions of why De Tocqueville and Mill think that democracy is a threat to the liberty of the individual and whether they are right, this paper will show that both De Tocqueville and Mill viewed democracy as a mechanism that could easily become tyrannical and thus overwhelm one's individual liberty. Considering that democracy in its various forms (direct, representative, constitutional) is capable of being corrupted (voters and/or representatives may be bribed, coerced, misinformed, misled, subjugated, harassed, mobbed, and so on), it… Continue Reading...

Law Enforcement and Corrections

administration, and corrections are linked with politics on various extents and levels. Prevailing political philosophy and ideology influence the structure, organization, as well as anticipation of a society's criminal justice organization. As a result, these institutions impact the manners in which criminal law is implemented and administered and corrections put into place (Law Library, 2017). Police agencies are part and parcel of the law enforcement. In a police agency undertakes its law enforcing operations in a political system that is corrupt, then it becomes just about unmanageable to eradicate and abolish the corruption within the police agency. In particular, it has been acknowledged… Continue Reading...

Ancient Rome Timeline of Military

end of the Republic. Your timeline should have at least 7 events. 200 CE: The rise of populist or democratic sentiments and political philosophy. Rome was not a democracy, although it was a Republic. By the 2nd century CE, populist tribunes started to make waves on the Roman political scene. These populist tribunes were mirrored by the uprisings by local governments and communities in Roman-acquired territories throughout the vast empire. With such a vast empire, and such a relatively weak method of centralized governance, it became increasingly impossible to achieve harmony and authoritative rule. It was not as if Rome usurped idyllic ways of life, so much as populist leaders did recognize… Continue Reading...

The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter G. Woodson

political philosophy embedded in the United States Constitution.As a result, “Du Bois criticized Washington for not demanding equality for African Americans,” (“Booker T. Washington,” 2017). Washington remains an important figure in that he knew how important it was to build bridges and never to isolate anyone from the dialogue. Woodson falls somewhere between the DuBois and Washington in that like DuBois, he championed a more comprehensive approach to erasing the deep-seated racist beliefs in the United States. In one chapter of Mis-Education, for example, Woodson specifically criticizes the backwards mentality… Continue Reading...

Torture and Interrogation Essay

as well. For instance, Schiemann emphasizes, “To the degree that political philosophy is concerned with the proper balance between legitimate state authority, including violence, on one hand, and individual autonomy, including autonomy of the body, on the other hand, then interrogational torture is also an important problem in normative political theory.”4  Despite these growing concerns, proponents of the global war on terrorism maintain that the use of torture is justified given the potential for future terrorist attacks on the scale of those of September 11, 2001 and the need to protect the country’s interests at home and abroad. For example,… Continue Reading...

Military Tribunals or Federal Courts Terrorism

procedure and also in terms of political philosophy; unlike civilian trials they can take place behind closed doors, barring access to the Fifth Estate. Therefore, when considering where terrorist suspects should be tried, the answer rests with clarifying what the intended goals of the trial are: to err on the side of caution even if it means convicting the innocent and overriding the principles of human rights; or to err on the side of human rights even if it means risking the release of a terrorist. Pros cons of each tribunal Generally, those in favor of… Continue Reading...

Fides Virtus

rule, Claudius demonstrated exceedingly meticulous leadership. In particular, his objectives were outstanding, and his political philosophy was intellectual. In addition, during the course of his reign of the Roman Empire, the Romans reveled in general success and there were very minimal grievances and criticism from the provinces. Moreover, his brevity was showcased in the key achievement, which was the organized invasion and overthrow of the south of Britain (Roman Empire, 2017). Titus Flavius Sabinus Vespasian is another leader that demonstrated these qualities. In particular, Vespasian was a very practical individual; he was a man of the people. His brevity can be perceived in the… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Philosophy" (2009, November 30) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-philosophy-16900

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Philosophy" 30 November 2009. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-philosophy-16900>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Philosophy", 30 November 2009, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-philosophy-16900