Political Theory if Nothing Else, Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 980 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

For example, one can consider the following quote from Hobbes: "The right of nature... is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life." (Harrison, 2003, p. 67). In other words, Hobbes is saying that every person has within them certain rights, yearnings and liberties; as such, the individual is entitled, and indeed should, pursue their own interests and not be oppressed by rulers. Likewise, rulers should not attempt to force subjects into submission or to rule by intimidation or fear- for Hobbes, power must be earned and maintained through a level of fairness (Rogers, et al., 2000). Within this scope, the ruler should be motivated, in Hobbes' opinion, by serving the interests of the people over whom they govern. Likewise, the citizens would be involved in the political process, and the ruler, having earned the right to rule, would have the duty to effectively lead with conscience rather than sheer force.

Political Philosophies of Machiavelli and Hobbes

Having taken a close look at the theories of Machiavelli and Hobbes respectively, it is possible to draw on the similarities and differences between the two in regard to their political philosophies. While it would be tempting to simply conclude that both men were totally dissimilar in their philosophies, this is not so; rather, there are some basic tenets upon which it can be said they agree.

Stuck Writing Your "Political Theory if Nothing Else," Term Paper?

View All Our Example Political Theory if Nothing Else, Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Admittedly to varying degrees, both Machiavelli and Hobbes believe in the use of force to maintain power- this is seen in the writings of Machiavelli and Hobbes respectively, based upon these direct quotes: "It is not wisdom but Authority that makes a law" (Viroli, 1998, p. 144);

Not believing in force is the same as not believing in gravitation." (Rogers, et al., 2000, p. 99). An essential difference between these philosophers in reference to force is how it is used; while Machiavelli advocates the use of force to gain and maintain power, Hobbes believes that force should only be used to maintain power which was gained through legitimate channels, the will of the people, and the cornerstone of freedom and liberty (Harrison, 2003).

Conclusion

Political philosophy, as well as the legitimacy of power, are pivotal issues that will likely continue to be debated as long as thinking individuals exist in the world. This being said, this research has shown that the ideas of two men from two different generations, holding different views in many areas, also seem to agree on others. In closing, perhaps this speaks the loudest regarding the nature of power and the state- authority, however gained, must be wielded with great care, for without that caution, chaos is likely to ensue......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Theory If Nothing Else " (2007, May 02) Retrieved June 15, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-theory-nothing-else-38010

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Theory If Nothing Else " 02 May 2007. Web.15 June. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-theory-nothing-else-38010>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Political Theory If Nothing Else ", 02 May 2007, Accessed.15 June. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/political-theory-nothing-else-38010
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example