Post Tenure Review the Issue Thesis

Total Length: 783 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3



Qualitative Data Analysis:

The study by O'Meara provides us with something of a template for understanding the qualitative variables which can be identified and addressed. O'Meara's study recognizes the demand for a collection of thick descriptive data based on the experiences of those who face the subject on a first-hand basis. The study points to several key pedagogic and tenure-related issues in which the gathering of first-person accounts may provide us with a greater depth of insight into the primary research imperative. Accordingly, O'Meara reports that the study "explored beliefs held by faculty and administrators about post-tenure review and the factors that influenced beliefs within one state system. Values of autonomy and collegiality, career stage, and institutional history and context were found to influence beliefs about the purposes, processes, and outcomes of post-tenure review." (O'Meara, 178)

This promotes the use of an open-ended interview method, perhaps best executed as a case study contextualized by one or a few educational institutions. By focusing on one university and gathering interviews with professors, administrators and even with students, it will be possible to build a substantial body of qualitative data on how post-tenure review is experienced.
By drawing a focus in the structure of the interview to such subjects as the values cited in the O'Meara study, it is possible to compile some understanding of values upon which there is consensus and values upon which there is division. This should help to reveal some distinction between the myths and truths of post-tenure review.

Validity:

Ensuring validity in the convergence of these methods will require the identification of both a control and an experimental population. These populations might best be yielded from two universities of similar geographical, economic and academic disposition as well as of similar scale and scope. By conducting side by side the combined quantitative and qualitative methods described above in a university where post-tenure review is in effect and one in which it is not, it will be possible to detect both the realistic and experiential distinctions between the two institutions. This, in turn, should allow for the assessment of the claims legitimizing post-tenure review.

Works.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Post Tenure Review The Issue" (2010, February 24) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/post-tenure-review-issue-14762

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Post Tenure Review The Issue" 24 February 2010. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/post-tenure-review-issue-14762>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Post Tenure Review The Issue", 24 February 2010, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/post-tenure-review-issue-14762