Presidentialism and the Alternatives Article Critique

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 661 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 2

Presidentialism

Lijphart, a. (1991). Constitutional choices for new democracies. Journal of Democracy 2(1): 72-84.

In "Constitutional Choices for New Democracies," Lijphart argues that the parliamentary/proportional representational model offers clear advantages over the alternatives available to architects of a democratic system of government. The "architects of new democratic constitutions" should take into consideration variables like ethnic minority representation and the need for reductions in unemployment when crafting their political policies (Lijphart, 1991, p. 72). With regards to most of the meaningful variables impacting developing nations or those in need of dramatic political restructuring, the author argues that "the combination of parliamentarism with proportional representation should be an especially attractive one," (Lijphart, 1991, p. 72).

To prove the point, the author provides a great degree of theoretical background and uses ample examples. The author points out the importance of electoral procedures and how they affect proportional representation in government. Moreover, the author points out key biases that stem from rigid frames of reference.

Stuck Writing Your "Presidentialism and the Alternatives" Article Critique?

View All Our Example Presidentialism and the Alternatives Article Critique

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

For example, the author speaks on the different emphases on "capacity to govern" or perceived stability versus "representativeness" or fairness for minority citizens (Lijphardt, 1991, p. 77). The only glaring weaknesses with the Lijphardt (1991) study are its lack of experimental data collection or research methodologies. The author relies heavily on conjecture and example. Moreover, Lijphardt (1991) makes generalizations about nations that either are or will be anachronistic.

In spite of these weaknesses, the Lijphardt (1991) study is valuable in pointing out the general reasons why a parliamentary system may be superior for many situations. Especially situations in which a nation-state comprises multiple ethnic groups, and needs to ensure income equity, a proportional representation and parliamentary system would work well. A government characterized by a proportional representation of the populace in government will facilitate minority representation, allow for greater participation of women, and also foster greater overall voter participation. After all, Lijphardt (1991) points out that parliamentary systems with proportional.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Presidentialism And The Alternatives" (2012, March 23) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/presidentialism-alternatives-113578

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Presidentialism And The Alternatives" 23 March 2012. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/presidentialism-alternatives-113578>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Presidentialism And The Alternatives", 23 March 2012, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/presidentialism-alternatives-113578
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example