Product Liability: Warranties and Torts Facts: Maria Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 870 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Product Liability: Warranties and Torts

Facts: Maria Gonzalez rented an apartment from Maria Garcia. Garcia installed a Morflo water heater, which was kept in an area inaccessible by tenants. The water heater and its manual contained extensive warnings indicating that burns could occur if the water was above 120 degrees. Gonzalez's 15-month-old child Angel was scalded while being bathed by his 15-year-old brother, in a manner contra-indicated by the warnings on the heater and in the manual. Angel and his mother brought suit against Morflo and its distributor, alleging defects in the design of the water heater and the failure to warn.

Should they recover?

Reasoning: A party cannot recover from a manufacturer when a product has been used in a non-conforming manner. A manufacturer meets its duty to warn by placing warnings on the product and in the manual provided for its use.

Answer: Yes.

Facts: Avery purchased a refrigerator from a retail store. The written contract stated that the refrigerator was sold "as is" and that the warranty of merchantability and all warranties of fitness were excluded. The refrigerator worked properly for a few weeks and then stopped. The store refused to do anything about it because of the exclusion of the warranties made by the contract; Avery claimed that this exclusion was not binding because it was unconscionable.

Stuck Writing Your "Product Liability: Warranties and Torts Facts: Maria" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Product Liability: Warranties and Torts Facts: Maria Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



Issue: Was Avery correct?

Reasoning: New products carry warranties of merchantability and fitness for use, which are required by law. A customer cannot contract with a merchant to ignore those laws.

10. Answer: No.

Facts: Zogarts manufactured and sold a practice device for beginning golfers. According to the statements on the package, the device was completely safe, and a player could never be struck by the device's golf ball. Hauter was hit by the ball while practicing with the device. He sued Zogarts, which denied liability on the ground that the statements were merely matters of opinion, so liability could not be based on them.

Issue: Was this a valid defense?

Reasoning: A customer relies upon the representations on a product's packaging when purchasing the product. Therefore, if a customer uses the device in the manner specified, but is injured anyway, he has a claim against the manufacturer.

11. Answer: Yes.

Facts: A buyer purchased an engine to operate an irrigation pump, which he selected the engine from a large number that were standing on the floor of the seller's stockroom. A label on the engine stated that it would produce 100 horsepower. The buyer needed an engine at least 80 horsepower, but in actual use in the buyer's irrigation system, the….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Product Liability Warranties And Torts Facts Maria" (2005, May 12) Retrieved May 1, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/product-liability-warranties-torts-facts-66292

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Product Liability Warranties And Torts Facts Maria" 12 May 2005. Web.1 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/product-liability-warranties-torts-facts-66292>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Product Liability Warranties And Torts Facts Maria", 12 May 2005, Accessed.1 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/product-liability-warranties-torts-facts-66292
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example