Pros and Cons of Paying Student Athletes Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 2680 words ( 9 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 7

Page 1 of 9

College Athletes Should be PaidPart 11.What is your topic?Should college athletes be paid.2.What is your thesis? With the words SHOULD or SHOULD NOT or MUST or MUST NOT or NEEDS TO:College athletes should be paid.3.What are the three sub-topics you will be discussing?College athletes bring in significant revenue for their universities. College athletes face high risk of injury. College athletes have limited opportunities to work and make money outside of their athletic commitments4.What is one of your counterarguments? - Remember, the counterargument or opposition is OPPOSITE from your thesis sentence.College athletes should not be paid as many of them already receive scholarships.5.What are your sources?Maryville University. “Should College Athletes Be Paid? Reasons Why or Why Not.”Maryville.edu. https://online.maryville.edu/blog/should-college-athletes-be-paid/ Accessed on April 20, 2023Sanderson, Allen R., and John J. Siegfried. 2015. "The Case for Paying CollegeAthletes." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 (1): 115-38.Part 2: Pre-WriteCollege athletes spend a lot of time putting in work to prepare for their games. They don’t have time for much else. If they are at a top-tier school, the universities rely on them for income. They are basically employees of the schools because they help to generate so much income from sports, which are broadcasted on TV and tickets to games are sold to fans. Merchandise is sold and a lot of people follow college sports. March Madness for basketball, for instance, is a huge revenue source.But college athletes, upon whom it all depends, get zero revenue. They might get a scholarship—but they are not able to generate any income for themselves due to NCAA regulations. That is a big problem because these same athletes don’t have time to do co-ops that other students can do. They don’t have time to start laying the groundwork for their future career, assuming it is not in professional sports. They aren’t able to get out there and network like other students can because they are expected to be in the gym or on the field or on the court helping the team prepare for the season.So even though they might have a scholarship (and not all of them do earn scholarships) they are not really able to get a job or do anything to support themselves even when they are doing so much to support the school. Why shouldn’t they get paid for what they do?Schools should make being a college athlete like any other job that you try out for. Players get a cut of revenue for performing or some other arrangement can be worked out. It would help to spread the wealth around, and it would show that schools aren’t taking advantage of student athletes anymore.Part 3: OutlineI. Introa. Background information on the issue of paying college athletesb. Thesis statement: College athletes should be compensated for their participation in sports because it would provide them with financial support, reflect the amount of time and effort they dedicate to their sport, and address the unfairness of the NCAA profiting from their labor without proper compensation.II. Body: First Argumenta. Explanation of the financial struggles faced by many college athletes, including the inability to work due to their sport schedule and NCAA rules preventing them from receiving outside income.b. Examples of how paying athletes could provide financial support, including stipends, insurance, and payment for autographs or endorsements.III. Body: Second Argumenta. Discussion of the significant time commitment required of college athletes, which often prevents them from pursuing part-time jobs or internshipsb. Examination of the discrepancy between the amount of time college athletes dedicate to their sport and the lack of compensation they receive in comparison to coaches and administratorsc. Risk involved to physical health of student athletes—no compensation for that?IV. Body: Third Argumenta. Analysis of the NCAA's financial gain from college sports, including revenue from broadcasting rights, merchandise, and sponsorshipsb. Explanation of the exploitative nature of the NCAA's current system, which profits from the labor of college athletes without adequately compensating them.V. Counter-argument and Rebuttala. College athletes receive scholarships as compensation for their participation in sports.b. Rebuttal: Scholarships do not cover the full cost of attendance and do not provide financial support for other expensesVI. Reviewa. Go over the main points once moreb. Build up to the call to actionVII. Conclusiona. Call to action for reforms in the NCAA's policies regarding payment for athletes.Part 4I Want College Athletes to be Paid and So Should You!IntroductionI have long enjoyed college sports and I am sure you have too. But have you ever wondered about whether these athletes are fairly compensated for the enjoyment they bring to fans? Think about how many star quarterbacks you watched over the years, or star hoopers—athletes who never went on to the pros but who did well enough to win fans for life through their athletic achievements at school.

Stuck Writing Your "Pros and Cons of Paying Student Athletes" Essay?

View All Our Example Pros and Cons of Paying Student Athletes Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Colleges made a lot off their performances, but the athletes themselves never saw a dime of that income. That is why I believe that college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports because they bring in significant revenue for their universities, face high risk of injury, and have limited opportunities to work and make money outside of their athletic commitments. In this paper, I am going to convince you that you should demand that colleges pay their athletes a fair wage for all the work they do.Sports Pays—Just Not if You’re a College AthleteWhen sports took off in America, college sports turned into a…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…much else. If they are at a top-tier school, the universities rely on them for income. They are basically employees of the schools because they help to generate so much income from sports, which are broadcasted on TV and tickets to games are sold to fans. Merchandise is sold and a lot of people follow college sports. March Madness for basketball, for instance, is a huge revenue source. But college athletes, upon whom it all depends, get zero revenue. They might get a scholarship—but they are not able to generate any income for themselves due to NCAA regulations. That is a big problem because these same athletes don’t have time to do co-ops that other students can do. They don’t have time to start laying the groundwork for their future career, assuming it is not in professional sports. They aren’t able to get out there and network like other students can because they are expected to be in the gym or on the field or on the court helping the team prepare for the season. So even though they might have a scholarship (and not all of them do earn scholarships) they are not really able to get a job or do anything to support themselves even when they are doing so much to support the school. Why shouldn’t they get paid for what they do? Make college athletes like any other job that you try out for. Players get a cut of revenue for performing or some other arrangement can be worked out. It would help to spread the wealth around, and it would show that schools aren’t taking advantage of student athletes anymore.ConclusionIt is time for the NCAA to reconsider its rules and allow college athletes to benefit financially from their athletic abilities. As we have discussed, college athletes bring in significant revenue for their universities, face high risk of injury, and have limited opportunities to work and make money outside of their athletic commitments. Prohibiting them from accepting payment for their sports performance is unfair and unjust.Therefore, I call upon you to start urging the NCAA to revise its policies and allow college athletes to be compensated for their hard work and dedication. This change will not only benefit the athletes but also help to create a more equitable and fair system. Let us recognize the value and contribution of college athletes and give them the opportunity to benefit financially from their talent, just like any other student who is allowed to earn money through part-time work or other means.In conclusion, college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports, and it is time for the NCAA to make the necessary changes to ensure….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Pros And Cons Of Paying Student Athletes" (2023, April 21) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/pros-cons-paying-student-athletes-2178597

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Pros And Cons Of Paying Student Athletes" 21 April 2023. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/pros-cons-paying-student-athletes-2178597>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Pros And Cons Of Paying Student Athletes", 21 April 2023, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/pros-cons-paying-student-athletes-2178597
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example