How to Protect Intellectual Property While Collaborating in Open Innovation with Firms Research Paper

Total Length: 1017 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 3

1

People should be interested in Intellectual Property (IP) because IP is an intangible business asset, and if IP is not protected then others can basically steal the asset and use it to further their own interests. Protecting IP is what helps to further innovation and ensure that resources are devoted to research and design. It is also about protecting one’s position in the marketplace. As Bican, Guderian and Ringbeck (2017) point out, businesses have to manage their knowledge to maintain a competitive advantage. If that knowledge is only loosely protected, others could take advantage of it as though it were a resource out in the wild waiting to be snatched up by anyone willing to take it.

2

Intellectual Property is best defined as a design, product or creation results from one’s own work and to which one has the rights for reproduction or distribution. IP is typically protected by copyright, patent or trademark, but not always. Algorithms that companies use to trade a market might be considered IP but they may not be protected by patent or copyright. The internal implications of IP are that a company often has to protect its secrets closely; other companies might try to poach workers who have access to IP and lure them away so that they can get a sense of what the other company is doing (Bican et al., 2017). Citadel is currently suing former employees for IP theft for exactly this reason.

Stuck Writing Your "How to Protect Intellectual Property While Collaborating in Open Innovation with Firms" Research Paper?



3

The major points of the article by Bican et al. (2017) are that businesses have to collaborate with external partners and that means sharing to some degree IP. This results in tension between the open innovation between the firms and IP rights. Bican et al.…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…both essentially make the same point: IP is too important to be shared by one company with another—unless that first company is looking to give up its competitive advantage. It also relates to the work by Zhang et al. (2018), who argue that in the field of medical science and technology IP must also be protected so that advancements in research are not stole by other firms. The study by Wexler (2018) likewise emphasizes this point and makes it clear that IP is a major issue in the criminal justice system because it is viewed by firms as an asset that is of utmost importance. If it were not, there would not be so many cases focused on it in the courts today. Finally, it relates to the study by Yu (2017) because both studies are about the difficulties that companies face when they partner with one another for collaborative….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"How To Protect Intellectual Property While Collaborating In Open Innovation With Firms" (2020, November 12) Retrieved May 17, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/protect-intellectual-property-while-collaborating-2175768

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"How To Protect Intellectual Property While Collaborating In Open Innovation With Firms" 12 November 2020. Web.17 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/protect-intellectual-property-while-collaborating-2175768>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"How To Protect Intellectual Property While Collaborating In Open Innovation With Firms", 12 November 2020, Accessed.17 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/protect-intellectual-property-while-collaborating-2175768