Qualitative Data Analysis in Evaluation a Federal Agency Program Book Review

Total Length: 796 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

Rogers (2010) chapter on qualitative analysis described many useful and practical methods to help use this tool effectively and efficiently. The purpose of this essay is to examine this book chapter and address the important and key issues that are presented in the literature. This essay will also provide practical examples of the information presented in this argument from federal agencies to help contextualize the information and to demonstrate the practicality of its methods at a governmental level.

Rogers proposed a complex systematic framework for analyzing qualitative data for evaluation in this chapter. He created the mnemonic PPOIISED to help guide this process. He stated that this mnemonic " is intended to remind users of three different meanings of the word poised in that good qualitative data analysis finds an appropriate balance between compteting imperatives, uses strategies that are focused on action, and has a sense of assurance based on a systematic approach and considered choices " (p.430).

PPOIISED stands for triggers for important questions that the researcher needs to be asking to validate the data. The following trigger words are used to help the researcher remember the method:

-Purposes

-Paradigms

-Options

-Interpretations

-Iterations

-Standards

-Ethics

-Displays Each one of these ideas provides a pillar for the framework of solid quantitative data analysis.

Stuck Writing Your "Qualitative Data Analysis in Evaluation a Federal Agency Program" Book Review?

The remainder of the chapter goes into great detail explaining each one of these principles and how they can contribute to a method of analysis.

Purposes: This keyword holds the most importance in the system. Researchers need to have a clear and definable purpose before beginning any type of analysis. The quality of information must be viewed through a purposeful lens in order to give it meaning.

Paradigms: It appears that research has transcended a bipolar paradigm where either all data was entirely qualitative or quantitative. Today's approach is much more of a hybrid. Paradigms are larger pictures in which the data must be viewed in order to hold any relevance. Federal agencies tend to resort back to the days of bipolarity. This is however inherent within governmental institutions where the idea of governance is bipolar in nature. The two poles consist of the government and the governed where, the government assumes a position of divine righteousness and infallibility within its edicts.

Options: Creativity is very important when doing research. The many options that govern any research question can be very helpful in opening up….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Qualitative Data Analysis In Evaluation A Federal Agency Program" (2013, March 09) Retrieved May 2, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/qualitative-data-analysis-evaluation-federal-103126

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Qualitative Data Analysis In Evaluation A Federal Agency Program" 09 March 2013. Web.2 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/qualitative-data-analysis-evaluation-federal-103126>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Qualitative Data Analysis In Evaluation A Federal Agency Program", 09 March 2013, Accessed.2 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/qualitative-data-analysis-evaluation-federal-103126