Rawlsian Theory of Justice Propounds That Social Term Paper

Total Length: 756 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Rawlsian Theory of Justice propounds that social justice should be governed by the principles of guaranteeing fundamental liberties to each person and ensuring that the least advantaged members of society benefit from any social and economic inequalities. The theory further argues that justice can only be brought about by a basic social structure, which is designed with a view to regulate inequalities that arise from social, natural, and historical precedents. In the light of the preceding context, a Rawlsian is likely to take the position that the process of inheritance is unjust since it perpetuates a social and historical inequality in social and economic arrangements. Therefore, inheritance should only be permitted if social institutions regulate inequalities arising from the process in a manner, which ensures that such inequality benefits the least advantaged population segments.

Central to the Rawlsian argument against unregulated inheritance would be the premise that every individual is entitled to an equal opportunity to obtain those positions in society that bring greater economic and social rewards. That being the case, any individual who acquires economic and social gain or position merely by virtue of being an heir descendant would have gained an unfair advantage over other members of society.

Stuck Writing Your "Rawlsian Theory of Justice Propounds That Social" Term Paper?

Of course, the libertarian would defend the existence of inheritance by stating that heirs are entitled to the acquisition of ancestral or bequeathed property, as it does not infringe on anyone else's rights.

In Rawl's view, however, economic and social gains through inheritance would, in fact, constitute an infringement of an individual's inviolable right to justice since there is nothing natural or inevitable about the social emphasis and weight given to transactions between individuals, either current or historical. For one, Rawls or a Rawlsian would contend that though the social arrangements and relationships that historically agreed to certain economic and social arrangements may have been fair and fully honored, there is nothing to gainsay that the conditions for the fair and free agreements still hold. Second, in any case, it would have to be proved that the very social circumstances and context under which the agreement was first arrived at was fair. In other words, a Rawlsian would argue that unless it could be proved that the property and wealth acquired was as per the….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rawlsian Theory Of Justice Propounds That Social" (2004, March 23) Retrieved June 6, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/rawlsian-theory-justice-propounds-social-163523

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rawlsian Theory Of Justice Propounds That Social" 23 March 2004. Web.6 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/rawlsian-theory-justice-propounds-social-163523>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rawlsian Theory Of Justice Propounds That Social", 23 March 2004, Accessed.6 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/rawlsian-theory-justice-propounds-social-163523