A Reduction in Force A Legal Analysis Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1350 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 5

Legal AnalysisA Reduction in Force (\"RIF\") is legal in the United States for legitimate business necessity. Employers undertaking a RIF in the United States are expected to consider the federal laws, contractual terms, and advance notice obligations to avoid any claims of discrimination from employees (Connolly Jr, Connolly, & Feinstein, 2018). Human Resource (HR) professionals are tasked with the responsibility of managing employees within an organization. The HR manager is expected to refer to the laws that govern employees\' rights and obligations while performing their duties.There are dire consequences for an organization that violates the employees\' rights, such as lawsuits, financial losses, and reputation damage. The HR manager should be familiar with legislations such as Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) laws that protect against discrimination of any person based on age, nationality, religion, disability, sex, or pregnancy. The wage and hours laws are also significant to the HR manager since they dictate the wages and number of working hours for an individual. Several other labor regulations, such as employee benefits laws, immigration laws, and workplace safety laws. The HR manager should consider all these laws before making any decision that concerns the employees to avoid liability (Mathis et al., 2017)AnalysisAli Sanders, being a naturalized American citizen his termination may be perceived as discrimination based on his citizenship or immigration status. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) is considered a federal law that offers protection to individuals from employment discrimination centered on immigration or citizenship status. Discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against an employee based on race, sex, or religion is also a violation of the law. It points out that it is illegal to discriminate based on national origin or citizenship status in terminating an employee (Rassas, 2020). The 1964 Civil Rights Act Title VII is also a federal law that offers protection for individuals discriminated against based on national origin, sex, age, or religion (Meiners, Ringleb, & Edwards, 2014). Hence, before terminating Ali Sanders\' employment contract, it is important to ensure that the company has not acted in a way that can be termed as discrimination based on immigration status.Ali is a highly skilled individual employed on a contract basis; hence it is proper to go through the \"just cause termination\" clause to confirm if the grounds for termination are permissible.

Stuck Writing Your "A Reduction in Force A Legal Analysis" Case Study?

View All Our Example A Reduction in Force A Legal Analysis Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

According to U.S law, a notice period is not necessary when terminating an individual employment relationship. However, the company will have to prove that there is no form of discrimination and that the company is making changes that including cutting down the number of employees.Employers are prohibited under U.S. law from selecting employees for termination based on age. The employer is expected to show legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons for…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…not a big issue that affects her performance or other employees. She has justified reasons for missing twelve days in the last three months. According to Title VII, the company employer has the responsibility to investigate the complaints of sexual harassment brought against Jeff, the project manager. Afterward, the employer should provide remedies to prevent any future occurrences of sexual harassment (Meiners, Ringleb, & Edwards, 2014).Paul Price has no advanced degree; he was hired because he was good at programming. However, the programs were abandoned hence no longer contribute to the company\'s growth. His age, race, or place of origin is irrelevant in this case. The employee suffers from a disease that affects the way he walks, and he feels like other employees treat him differently because of this. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), it is illegal to discriminate against employees with a disability. It is the company\'s mandate to provide reasonable accommodation to disabled employees (Walsh, 2015). To avoid any liability, the company will have to demonstrate that Paul\'s termination was not based on discrimination but on the fact that accommodating him would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the business. This is because the company has financial issues, the programming was abandoned, and the online business was shut down. Thus, having him on the team would be an unnecessary….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"A Reduction In Force A Legal Analysis" (2020, October 31) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/reduction-force-legal-analysis-2177143

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"A Reduction In Force A Legal Analysis" 31 October 2020. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/reduction-force-legal-analysis-2177143>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"A Reduction In Force A Legal Analysis", 31 October 2020, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/reduction-force-legal-analysis-2177143
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example