Rogerian Argument on Animal Testing Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1228 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 4

In this case those supporting testing might proclaim there is no evidence suggesting the animal always suffers ill-effects, therefore testing is not always wrong.

This methodology however is flawed. Proponents of animal testing fail to consider the number of animals that experience reduced life span or reduced quality of life resulting in the confined environment in which they must live while testing. Further, proponents of testing fail to identify what types of tests are safe and which are not. The very fact that animals must be used to test something suggests that some danger is always imminent, thus the life or quality of life of animals tested is always at risk. It does not matter whether that risk is small or very large. All risk is worthy of consideration and notice.

Unfortunately those whose religious practices forbid the use of animals as experimental tools often go to extreme measures to prove their vantage is correct. They consistently rely on moral and ethically clauses that may not be universally accepted. One way to get around this is through a process of communication and collaboration, where all parties agree to meet and come to an acceptable resolution satisfying the needs of both parties.

With respect to animal rights there is a middle ground that can be acceptable to both opponents and proponents of animal testing. This middle ground is not extreme; rather, it would force animal testing companies to engage in "humane reform" (Regan, 688). This type of reform is one that allows each party to identify what practices are safe and generally well tolerated and which practices must be abolished due to their nature.

Many persons strongly oppose the use of animals for scientific, sport, vanity and other forms of testing. On the other hand, many proponents insist the use of animals is necessary to promote better quality of life outcomes for human beings, especially humans that benefit from experiments that lead to safer medical products and even safer cosmetic products.

Stuck Writing Your "Rogerian Argument on Animal Testing" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Rogerian Argument on Animal Testing Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Because each party has equal ground, they can build trust by meeting to arbitrate their differences before an objective third party. This could lead to open communication and discussion.

Conclusions

Resolution takes best of both sides and offers conformity. To satisfy all parties in this case example, it is necessary that each party compromise so a uniform decision that is acceptable to both parties is realized and expedited. In this case, opponents of animal testing could agree to tests involving scientific experiments that may save lives or promote the discovery of vaccines or other medicines that may prove life saving to humans. The proponents of testing can agree to use products without endangering the animal or at the very least, provide the animals with a more natural habitat and provide animals with some form of acceptable pain control, so that if they suffer ill effects from testing, the animal will not pass with pain. Pain control is an essential ingredient to successful exploration using animals.

The proponents could also give a little, agreeing only to test certain groups of animals, perhaps those that are already diagnosed with chronic illness, for sport or for vanity uses. They can also agree to provide adequate food and nourishment and comfortable surroundings to animals kept in captivity for testing, whether the testing is harmful in nature or not. Because these uses are not critical to improving the quality of life of people, they may agree to conduct such testing as minimally as possible under close supervision by an animal rights advocate to ensure the needs and wishes of both parties are satisfied at some level......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rogerian Argument On Animal Testing" (2007, November 16) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/religionanimalrights-rogerian-argument-animal-34281

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rogerian Argument On Animal Testing" 16 November 2007. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/religionanimalrights-rogerian-argument-animal-34281>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Rogerian Argument On Animal Testing", 16 November 2007, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/religionanimalrights-rogerian-argument-animal-34281
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example