Restrictive Covenants Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 908 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Restrictive Covenants

The case of Shawver v. Huckleberry was a dispute between the plaintiffs, Scott and Mary Shawver (Shawvers), and the defendant, Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C. (Huckleberry), an Idaho limited partnership, over the applicability of restrictive covenants to a land-sales contract between the parties. The Shawvers alleged that Huckleberry breached the parties' sales agreement by making amendments to the restrictive covenants applicable to the property. Those amendments rendered the Shawvers proposed house designs nonconforming and Huckleberry refused to allow the Shawvers to build the proposed house design on the property in question. The Shawvers brought suit against Huckleberry for specific performance of the sale agreement. The district court granted judgment in favor of the Shawvers, awarding specific performance of the sale agreement, subject only to the original covenant. Both parties appealed from the district court's decision and the Idaho Supreme Court reversed the district court's decision.

The resolution of the case depended on the applicability of restrictive covenants and amendments to those restrictive covenants to the parties' sale agreement. A brief summary of the factual background is necessary in order to understand why the court determined that the amendments to the restrictive covenants, in addition to the original restrictions, governed the parties' agreement. On November 9, 1999 the parties executed an agreement to reserve a lot for the Shawvers. At that time, Huckleberry's agent provided the Shawvers with a copy of the draft restrictive covenants (draft CC& Rs). The draft CC& Rs provided specific guidelines for houses built in the Huckleberry Estates.

Stuck Writing Your "Restrictive Covenants" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Restrictive Covenants Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

The Shawvers designed a house that met the requirements of the draft CC& Rs. On July 21, 2000, Huckleberry recorded the original restrictive covenants (original CC& Rs) for the subdivision. The original CC& Rs contained an amendment provision, which provided for amendment of any provision of the CC& Rs upon written approval of at least 75% of the lot owners.

On July 28, 2000, a sales agreement was delivered by Huckleberry to the Shawvers. The Shawvers signed the agreement and delivered it to Huckleberry on August 17, 2000. The agreement contained an indication by the Shawvers that they obtained and reviewed the applicable CC& Rs. On August 8, 2000, the Shawvers submitted plans for their home to Huckleberry. On August 11, 2000, Huckleberry rejected the plans. On August 28, 2000, Huckleberry recorded amendments to the original CC& Rs (first amended CC& Rs), which prevented the Shawvers from building their house as planned. On August 31, 2000, the Shawvers conditionally tendered the balance of the purchase price to a closing agent, on the condition that their purchase be governed by the original CC& Rs and not the first amended CC& Rs.

The Shawvers contended that the first amended CC& Rs were invalid because Huckleberry….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Restrictive Covenants" (2005, February 28) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/restrictive-covenants-62743

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Restrictive Covenants" 28 February 2005. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/restrictive-covenants-62743>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Restrictive Covenants", 28 February 2005, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/restrictive-covenants-62743
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example