On the other hand, nature-as-machine proponents view nature holistically, and the "whole is greater than the sum of its parts," (Oelschlaeger 1991 p. 130). Water is a lake, an ocean, or a river. Oelschlaeger calls seeing the forest instead of the tr Continue Reading...
17). A that they assumed that the entire world of plants and animals, even the land itself, was sacred Paleolithic humans did not see themselves as better than other features in the natural world. They thought that everything in the natural world Continue Reading...
" By writing her book, Carson in fact is credited with launching "the modern environmental movement," the authors insist. And her book was far more than just the "cumulative and devastating biological effects of pesticides," Bekoff writes; "it is abo Continue Reading...
Were such changes necessary? According to what Oelshlaeger explains in his book, it appears that much of these changes are interconnected. With agriculture "naturally" come other transitions in the society. In fact, "neo" or "new" implies the many c Continue Reading...
Human beings, while being superior, are nonetheless part of the physical world and subject to its laws. Mankind is made in His image and is therefore distinct from the rest of creation This belief is central to the dichotomy outlined above: human Continue Reading...
