Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) Network Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 960 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 3

Increasingly, those who pay for wireless service intentionally keep their networks open as a way to protest what they consider to be exorbitant fees charged by service providers (Marriott, 2006).

Those against piggybacking say this practice does have a cost for those paying for wireless services because their broadband connections are slowed down by additional piggybacker traffic, sometimes so much so that the access becomes unusable. Others argue that taking or borrowing without permission is unethical and that lack of security to not justify unauthorized access. Anti-piggybackers want laws to be introduced to prevent piggybacking just like unauthorized access to other types of property (Ethical dilemmas of unsecured wireless networks).

Some local governments agree with sentiments against piggybacking and are enacting laws to stop it. For instance, the local government in Westchester County, N.Y. enacted a county-wide law requiring all commercial businesses to secure their wireless LAN access and to post signs on the wall to advise the user to "install a firewall or other computer security measure" (Local govts. target Wi-Fi piggybacking, 2007). The state of New York is considering similar legislation.

Stuck Writing Your "Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) Network" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) Network Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Recently, California passed the "Wi-Fi User Protection Bill," which requires manufacturers to provide security warnings and advice in the products they sell. California's AB215 forces wireless LAN vendors to either put a security warning sticker on the wireless router that presents an installation message advising that it's time to secure the network, or to secure the wireless LAN through a service. Some believe that California's new legislation will impact the entire country because manufacturers are likely to change all of their equipment, not just what's sold in California (Local govts. target Wi-Fi piggybacking, 2007).

As we have seen, other than weak efforts by local government in California and New York, laws against shared access don't exist. It seems ridiculous to try to use our overcrowded judicial system to deal with this issue even if more strict laws were developed. Technology created the shared access and, ultimately, technology will have to be the vehicle by which access is restricted to authorized users. As long as doors are left open, people will enter......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity Wi-Fi Network" (2007, January 27) Retrieved May 30, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/shared-wireless-wireless-fidelity-wi-fi-40390

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity Wi-Fi Network" 27 January 2007. Web.30 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/shared-wireless-wireless-fidelity-wi-fi-40390>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Shared Wireless Wireless-Fidelity Wi-Fi Network", 27 January 2007, Accessed.30 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/shared-wireless-wireless-fidelity-wi-fi-40390
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example