Slavery Abolitionist Vs. Fire Eaters Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1138 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 4

This information is important, because it shows how Northerners did not fully understand the way that they indirectly supported slavery. Where, the various raw material produced by slaves, would be used to help benefit the citizens in these areas and the country as whole (by increasing trade).Those who are claiming that slavery should be abolished, are showing their lack of understanding surrounding the various issues of economics. As a result, one could argue that this hypocritical nature is why the Southern states should be their own country. Where, they would be treated by their counterparts in the North, on an equal basis as businessmen vs. oppressors that must stopped.

5. Garber, Mark. "From Constitutional Law to Constitution Politics." Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 86. Print.

The source from Garber, discusses the legal impact of slavery from the beginning. Where, it talks about how in the Constitution there are various clauses and principals that protect the right of slave owners. At the same time, it is acknowledging the institution of slavery as legal (through the establishment of counting slaves, as less than one person for the census in the Constitution). From a fire eaters' perspective, this shows how within the Constitution, it is acknowledging that slavery is legal and should continue to exist.

Stuck Writing Your "Slavery Abolitionist Vs. Fire Eaters" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Slavery Abolitionist Vs. Fire Eaters Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Where, the Constitution has supremacy, to any other laws that are passed by Congress or the states.

6. Kommers, Don. "The Judicial Power." American Constitutional Law. Lanham: Rowen and Littlefield. 87 -- 89. Print.

To correlate the different views of legality, the source from Kommers outlines, how Dred Scotts' master was constantly transferred in between: slave and free states. This is because he was an officer in the United States Army and was always moving around. When they moved to different free states such as: Wisconsin, Minnesota or Illinois, it was assumed that Scott could no longer be required to remain in slavery. Consequently, Scott challenged the Constitutionality of slavery in the United States Supreme Court. The results were: that Scott is not an American citizen; he does have any rights or legal protections and cannot claim that he is free (because he lives in a state where it is not legal). From the fire eaters' perspective, this is confirmation of the legality of slavery and the principals behind it. As a result, they would argue that any attempt to limit this Constitutional right should be dealt with; by having the Southern states form their own nation. This will ensure that slave owners are treated with dignity and respect, based upon the legality of the institution......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Slavery Abolitionist Vs Fire Eaters" (2010, September 21) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/slavery-abolitionist-fire-eaters-8360

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Slavery Abolitionist Vs Fire Eaters" 21 September 2010. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/slavery-abolitionist-fire-eaters-8360>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Slavery Abolitionist Vs Fire Eaters", 21 September 2010, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/slavery-abolitionist-fire-eaters-8360
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example