Statistical Data Analysis of the Term Paper

Total Length: 1380 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 5

This analysis was deemed necessary as differences can exist on the basis of an overall group effect and not an individual variable (question) effect and visa versa.

Male Mean Per Question Analysis x Department

Source of Sum of d.f.

Mean

Variation

Squares between error

Required F. value: 4.21 ? < 0.05

Concluding Statement: With a received F. value of 1.04 and a required value of F = 4.21 the conclusion can be drawn that no statistically significant differences exist in attitude toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development for male radiographer participants within the three health care departments at a probability level of 95%. Therefore, all three health care groups consisting of males perceive attitudes towards Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development the same.

Female Mean Per Question Analysis x Department

Source of Sum of d.f.

Mean

Variation

Squares between error

Required F. Value: 4.21 ? < 0.05

Concluding Statement: With a received F. value of 0.1757 and a required value of F = 4.21 the conclusion can be drawn that no statistically significant differences exist in attitude toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development for female radiographer participants within the three health care departments at a probability level of 95%. Therefore, all three health care groups consisting of females perceive attitudes towards Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development the same.

Male Mean Per Question Analysis x Grade Level

Source of Sum of d.f.

Mean

Variation

Squares between error

Required F. Value: 4.21 ? < 0.05

Concluding Statement: With a received F. value of 0.8112 and a required value of F = 4.21 the conclusion can be drawn that no statistically significant differences exist in attitude toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development for male radiographer participants within the three grade levels at a probability level of 95%. Therefore, all three-grade levels consisting of males perceive attitudes towards Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development the same.

Female Mean Per Question Analysis x Grade Level

Source of Sum of d.f.

Mean

Variation

Squares between error

Required F.
Value: 4.21 ? < 0.05

Concluding Statement: With a received F. value of 0.2500 and a required value of F = 4.21 the conclusion can be drawn that no statistically significant differences exist in attitude toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development for female radiographer participants within the three grade levels at a probability level of 95%. Therefore, all three-grade levels consisting of females perceive attitudes towards Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development the same.

Mean Score Total Responses for Department x Grade Level Composite

Source of Sum of d.f.

Mean

Variation

Squares between

8.4444E-02 error

7.2222E-02

Required F. Value: 5.14 ? < 0.05

Concluding Statement: With a received F. value of 1.169 and a required value of F = 5.14 the conclusion can be drawn that no statistically significant differences exist in attitude toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development for all participating radiographers regardless of grade level and healthcare department affiliation at a probability level of 95%. Therefore, all three-grade levels and department areas consisting of males and females perceive attitudes towards Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development the same.

Primary Conclusion. Even though the study reported statistically significant difference in attitudes toward Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development in the area of health care department areas initial analysis determined that there existed no statistical significant difference within each separate area; and that the differences reported with respect to each individual grade level did not impact upon overall non-statistical significance between grade level and department area. It is assumed therefore that those differences reported in grade level and department area individually might possibly be due to the influence of random error and not measurable error. As such, an explanation as to why the independent area difference occurred based on possible random error is not possible.

In addition to the above it can be concluded that males and females, regardless of grade level and department affiliation view Career Choice, Professional Relationships and Development.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Statistical Data Analysis Of The" (2005, February 27) Retrieved May 21, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/statistical-data-analysis-62524

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Statistical Data Analysis Of The" 27 February 2005. Web.21 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/statistical-data-analysis-62524>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Statistical Data Analysis Of The", 27 February 2005, Accessed.21 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/statistical-data-analysis-62524