Terrorism Justified? When Looking at the Principles Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 823 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Terrorism Justified?

When looking at the principles of war theory, the moral distinctions made between state-sponsored warfare and terrorism by stateless nations may not always be justified. The examiner must consider both the jus ad bellum, or justification for going to war, and the jus in bello, or how the war is prosecuted. Some ethicists state that acts of war can only be justified when committed by one nation against another, and that groups within states cannot have that status. Therefore, any means such internal groups use to prosecute a war are by definition, wrong. However, by this standard, the United States exists because of acts of terrorism.

The question becomes, then, to define terrorism and then to evaluate acts of terrorism according to whether they are acts of a just war or not. If groups of people who are politically organized but do not have a nation of their own prosecute a just war, their acts may be justified. This requires that we look at the intentions of the group prosecuting the war, and whether they have just cause or not.

It stands to reason that probability of success must be considered in a just war; otherwise the soldiers and civilians are likely to endure great hardship for little gain. However, fights for self-determination, liberation or freedom may not have a guarantee of success at the onset.

Stuck Writing Your "Terrorism Justified? When Looking at the Principles" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Terrorism Justified? When Looking at the Principles Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

However, when a sub-nation of people is oppressed, denied basic civil liberties or systematically repressed by the ruling government, some could view as those goals as so compelling that they would justify the attempt. The United States exists because a political group within a state believed this to be true.

The most compelling argument against any legitimacy for terrorists might be the concept of "legitimate authority." However, the fact of sovereignty does not automatically confer moral authority. If that were the case, Hitler would have had a legitimate right to Poland, and racial segregation would be acceptable if the government said so. There is no question of sovereign authority when a nation wages war, but it is more difficult when the war is waged by a stateless nation. However, the world has multiple populations who are stateless through no fault of their own and who want to liberate themselves to be self-determining nations. If these groups of people see themselves as a national entity with just cause, their prosecution of war should be judged by the same standards applied to nations….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terrorism Justified When Looking At The Principles" (2002, September 30) Retrieved May 16, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terrorism-justified-looking-principles-135775

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terrorism Justified When Looking At The Principles" 30 September 2002. Web.16 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terrorism-justified-looking-principles-135775>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terrorism Justified When Looking At The Principles", 30 September 2002, Accessed.16 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terrorism-justified-looking-principles-135775
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example