Terry Vs. Ohio Terry Vs Ohio the Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 786 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Terry vs. Ohio

Terry Vs Ohio

The issue of what constitutes a violation of the fourth amendment forms the basis of the argument in the case of Terry vs. Ohio. In this case the petitioner Terry was stopped and frisked by the officer on the streets. A brief description of the situation is as follows. Detective McFadden was walking his beat when he observed two individuals who in his opinion were "casing" the joint with the intention of robbing the place in the daylight hours. This opinion was based on his observation and years of experience (Terry v. Ohio 2012). The suspects moved away from the initial area and were kept under surveillance by the detective. When the men joined a third person a few blocks away the officer identified himself as a police officer, requested the men's names and proceeded to pat down the outside of the men's clothing. The officer found a revolver in the petitioner's over coat and in the coat pocket of one of his accomplices. The men were later arrested and charged with the possession of a concealed weapon. What is crucial in this case is that at no time did the detective place his hands under the external clothing of the accomplices and he only placed his hand under the petitioner's outer clothing when he felt an object that he believed to be a weapon.

Stuck Writing Your "Terry Vs. Ohio Terry Vs Ohio The" Essay?

View All Our Example Terry Vs. Ohio Terry Vs Ohio the Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



The case created a quite a stir and went to the state supreme court and later to the Supreme Court of the United States. The case therefore presents an important set of principles and precedents that govern law enforcement today. During the trial the defense motioned to have the evidence found on the men thrown out as the defense argued that the weapons were illegally discovered. The prosecution on the other hand argued that the evidence was discovered during a search of the defendants that was incidental to a lawful arrest. The court did not approve the motion to suppress and the weapons were therefore admissible into evidence. Of critical importance at this time was the distinction in the court of the difference between a "stop" and an arrest as well as a "frisk" and an actual search of the individual. The appeals court affirmed the lower court decision and the state supreme court dismissed the appeal stating that there was "….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terry Vs Ohio Terry Vs Ohio The" (2012, August 27) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terry-ohio-terry-ohio-75309

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terry Vs Ohio Terry Vs Ohio The" 27 August 2012. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terry-ohio-terry-ohio-75309>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Terry Vs Ohio Terry Vs Ohio The", 27 August 2012, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/terry-ohio-terry-ohio-75309
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example