Theoretical Contributions of Durkheim and Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1931 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 6

662). In other words, individuals coalesce around environments repetitively to form the collective. The collective structure stays even when the individual is alone. This is close to the collective representations of Durkheim, but it is based on innate or genetic structures that connect during the repetition of social encounters (which in Allport are not religious). The social bonding function is similar: "The collective-structure event-format (so called 'reality of the group') is thus preserved, though the particular contacts of individuals may vary in space, time, and number" (Allport, 1955, p. 662).

This interweaving with the collective has lasting effects on the individual structure. He says, "It is also worth noting that the collective structure itself is often represented, usually in a schematic or abridged format, in the meaning-cycles of the individuals involved, on the basis of their contacts with other individuals in the regular and repetitive course of the structure's operation" (p. 662). Here we see Allport's analogous notion of the interiorization of norms and socialization.

Stuck Writing Your "Theoretical Contributions of Durkheim And" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Theoretical Contributions of Durkheim and Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

The individual is included in social tangents beyond his individual structures (she may belong to indefinite number of collectives). The behavior of the individual within the collective structure has both inside and outside aspects (social). The individual is in the collective, while the collective is represented in meaning-cycles within the individual. All of this forms the basis of Allport's dynamic-structural theory of perceptual-social frames of reference, and connects with his explanation of the interstructured meanings of social norms, customs, collective attitudes, and conformities. While the effect is similar to Durkheim, the argument is quite different. In fact, in Allport there are no bodies, individuals, groups, or things -- just abstract kinematic concepts. At the end of the day, material itself vanishes!

Conclusion

This essay has briefly engaged the theories of Durkheim and Allport. Both men made wide-ranging contributions to the field of social psychology. In attempting to compare these theoretical ideas, it has tried to clarify some similarities and differences in their.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Theoretical Contributions Of Durkheim And" (2010, March 16) Retrieved May 16, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/theoretical-contributions-durkheim-681

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Theoretical Contributions Of Durkheim And" 16 March 2010. Web.16 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/theoretical-contributions-durkheim-681>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Theoretical Contributions Of Durkheim And", 16 March 2010, Accessed.16 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/theoretical-contributions-durkheim-681
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example