Trial by Jury Term Paper

Total Length: 953 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

Trial by Jury

One of the most controversial issues today in the area of criminal justice is that of the right of all defendants to a trial by jury their peers. While most arguments are for or against this right, careful consideration of specific issues and kinds of cases suggests that trial by jury should not be abolished entirely, but should not be an absolute right. The idea of trial by jury can be retained in the American legal system through compromise and by limiting trial by jury to specific cases and courts. Having specialized courts for particular legal issues such as medical malpractice or other highly technical issues would remedy many of the problems that critics of the current system grapple with as legal scholars and moral individuals.

Often, as seen in the pairing of the essays of the noted defense attorney, media personality, and Harvard legal scholar Alan Dershowitz against the words of Christie Davies, the debate over the right to a trial by jury can be very polarized. Dershowitz calls juries "Unsung Heroes," stating that "Juries offer true justice" in keeping with the populist and democratic spirit of America. Christie Davies's "Trial by Jury Should Be Abolished" takes the contrary view, calling the right to trial by jury an outdated system that was viable only in eras of less complicated legal and technical questions, and in a more homogeneous America.

However, the polarized views of Dershowitz and Davies must be given more consideration in the context of actual specifics of the jury system.


Historically, it is important to remember that when trial by jury was introduced in England to replace trial by ordeal, "it was unquestionably an improvement. Trial by jury enjoyed high favor in the enlightened world through the 18th century and was passed from England to the United States. And there it still rests in our Constitution's Sixth and Seventh amendments."(Grenier, 1994) But, Davies and Richard Grenier both point out that "during the last decade ignorant and often quite silly jurors have dished out awards of millions and even billions of dollars" in medical malpractice cases under questionable circumstances, more out of emotional sympathy than legal compliance with their duty as citizens or respect for medical facts and data. (Grenier, 1994)

Even supporters of the jury system differ in their opinion of the ability of juries to nullify laws they find unfair. Robert Anton Wilson in "Jury Nullification: Freedom's Last Chance," recommends that a common man or woman should contest bad laws in the justice system to preserve democracy. Mark S. Pulliam counters in "Jury Nullification Should Not Be Allowed" that nullification gives too much power to individuals without a legal background who may be swayed by emotion rather than legal logic. Thus, a balance must be struck between democracy and legal formalities in the jury system. With this in mind,….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

CSI Effect

producers of trial in the judicial system. Such measures may be grave and even controversial because they may challenge some valued and established practices of the system of trial by jury in the American Justice system. Judges may change these practices with utmost caution. The effect of CSI on the Criminal Justice System Even though CSI is portrayed as a well documented phenomenon, there is little concrete evidence of the actual effect of CSI on the criminal justice system (Cole & Dioso-Villa, 2007). These accounts are based on comments associated with various officers of the judiciary. A review done on socio literature shows a different story. Scholars in the legal spheres characterize CSI effect as a speculation and… Continue Reading...

Guantanamo Bay Essay

controversy concerning the specific constitutional provisions that are applicable outside the United States, a trial by jury is a fundamental right that should be applied to Guantanamo Bay as well (McDonald, 2013). As McDonald (2013) concludes, “Therefore, the government cannot lawfully conduct trials in Guantanamo Bay without adhering to the Jury Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment” (2013, p. 702). Beyond the foregoing, the naval base at Guantanamo Bay is enormously expensive and the U.S. is not receiving a good return on this investment even though Cuba refuses the $4,095 lease payment each year. For instance, according to Eichenwald (2014), “Macho preening does not… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Trial By Jury" (2005, November 12) Retrieved May 14, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/trial-jury-70441

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Trial By Jury" 12 November 2005. Web.14 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/trial-jury-70441>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Trial By Jury", 12 November 2005, Accessed.14 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/trial-jury-70441