TX Innocence Project Exclusionary Rule Essay

Total Length: 769 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

TX Innocence Project

The problem with scientific evidence

There is an upsurge in the scientific means of conducting investigations into issues, and the use of the latest technologies that are geared towards making things easier when it comes to unraveling the mysteries surrounding the evidence required in courts of law for prosecution. This is a trend that is global and has deeply taken root in the U.S.A.

However, from the look of various cases as those found in The Texas Tribune (2012) it is apparent that there are various errors that can accompany the scientific evidence hence they cannot be relied upon on an absolute accuracy or implementation basis.

There are various problems that are associated with the scientific evidence as presented by Robert D. Meyers et.al (1999) numerated as below:

The problem of cost: this is one of the first and foremost prohibitive facts about the scientific evidence. It has been proven that it is quite expensive to process proper evidence in the science laboratories hence many would rather do away with a case or give in to a case rather than struggling to raise the finances to carry out DNA analysis or the other related scientific evidence processing.

Stuck Writing Your "TX Innocence Project Exclusionary Rule" Essay?



The problem of undue influence: since it has been observed that many judges would give more weight to the scientific evidence and consider what comes from the laboratories as the gospel truth and not able to fall short of the threshold by any standards. However, it has been in the public domain that there are various inaccuracies that usually come with the scientific evidence hence the undue influence that the scientific evidence has over the years exerted on the legal system overshadows even the inaccuracies that may come with it.

The problem of comprehension: the scientific evidence use in the courts often present the challenge of lack of comprehension among the lay fact finders who may not be in a position to effectively understand the scientific and technological evidences and jargons therein that may be presented in the court.

The problem of comprehension by the jury: there is a possibility that the jury may not understand fully the scientific evidence that may be presented before them. This is due to the fact that the jury may be specialized in the legal implications of the….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"TX Innocence Project Exclusionary Rule" (2012, March 22) Retrieved May 21, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/tx-innocence-project-exclusionary-rule-55243

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"TX Innocence Project Exclusionary Rule" 22 March 2012. Web.21 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/tx-innocence-project-exclusionary-rule-55243>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"TX Innocence Project Exclusionary Rule", 22 March 2012, Accessed.21 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/tx-innocence-project-exclusionary-rule-55243