United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court Case Analysis

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 712 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

The Unites States vs Park United States Supreme Court The United States v. Park United States Supreme Court 421 U.S. 658 (1975)Acme Markets, a rational food chain organization, has employed many people, nearly 36,000, and it has around 874 retail outlets and 12 general warehouses (Community, 2022). It has many leaders, including the president’s office, and respondent Park was the CEO during the conviction of the case. In 1970, the government charged Ace and the respondent with violating the state’s laws. After the inspectors from FDA conducted their inspections at their warehouse, they found a widespread of rodents at the warehouse. They issued a note to Acme Markets to address the matter. However, Acme Markets failed to comply even after several interventions convicted them of violating state laws. Although the chain pleaded guilty, the corporate office denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty. But after several trials, the corporate office was found guilty on all accounts and was demanded to pay a fine. It resulted in the appellate court intervening since they found the jury instruction erroneous.The Applicable LawsBesides, the case involved human consumption products, and any organization offering these products has an affirmative duty under the Federal Food Act to take precautions to ensure they remain fit for human consumption.

Stuck Writing Your "United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court" Case Analysis?

View All Our Example United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court Case Analysis

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Even though the corporate office denied the allegations, they were involved in the business. Thus, for the chain to be held accountable, the corporate office needed…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…2022). However, the appellate court’s jurisdiction allowed a guilty judgment because they found that the defendant accountable for the food and unsanitary conditions was from the corporate office. The court cautioned that this fact alone did not necessitate finding Park guilty, but they were left to judge under what rationale the defendant was responsible.In conclusion, critically analyzing the case, one will notice that the “responsible corporate officer doctrine governs it.” Under this doctrine, it indicates that the defendant had all the capabilities to prevent the violation of the law. Therefore, after being issued the first notice of the invasion of the rodents in the warehouse, they could have acted immediately on methods to eliminate them as they contribute to unsanitary….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court" (2022, June 12) Retrieved May 13, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/united-states-park-supreme-court-2179525

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court" 12 June 2022. Web.13 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/united-states-park-supreme-court-2179525>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"United States Vs Park United States Supreme Court", 12 June 2022, Accessed.13 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/united-states-park-supreme-court-2179525
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example