U.S. V. Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 702 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain (1992) Supreme Court Decision

Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. Alvarez-Machain (1992) that "forcible abduction of a foreign national does not prohibit his trial in a U.S. Court" dealt a body blow to international law, the implications of which are still being felt. Small wonder, therefore, that the Court's majority (6-3) decision was considered unjust by international human rights organizations and even by three of Supreme Court's own judges, led by Justice Stevens, who dissented strongly. I agree with Judge Steven's dissenting opinion for the reasons explained in this essay.

Strange Logic:

As pointed out by Justice Stevens in his dissenting opinion, allowing kidnapping of people from the territory of a foreign country, just because there is no express provision disallowing such an act in a treaty, is strange logic. By an extension of this logic every act, whether legal or illegal, moral or immoral, not mentioned in a particular treaty would be deemed allowable. Justice Stevens appropriately records in his dissent whether the Court's majority would also endorse behavior such as torture and execution because they were not explicitly prohibited by the terms of the Extradition Treaty between the U.S. And Mexico.

Stuck Writing Your "U.S. V. Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision" Term Paper?

View All Our Example U.S. V. Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



Violation of International Law:

Besides the application of such flawed logic, the majority decision in Alvarez ignored a fundamental principle of international law, i.e., respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity of an independent country. Performing acts of sovereignty in another state is a gross violation of international law, whatever the justification. Kidnapping a person from a foreign, friendly country for a suspected crime is doubly condemnable and opens up a Pandora's box of similar illegal acts. Perhaps realizing how wrong the act of kidnapping a foreign national from a sovereign country was, Justice Rehnquist himself noted while delivering the majority opinion of the Court, " ... respondent may be correct that his abduction was "shocking" and in violation of general international law principles ... "

Outcome of Trial Proves the Act Unjust:

Not only was the principle behind the abduction of Alvarez-Machain wrong, the aftermath of the incident, has further underlined the inappropriateness of the….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"U S V Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision" (2005, June 12) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/us-alvarez-machain-1992-supreme-court-decision-66364

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"U S V Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision" 12 June 2005. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/us-alvarez-machain-1992-supreme-court-decision-66364>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"U S V Alvarez-Machain 1992 Supreme Court Decision", 12 June 2005, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/us-alvarez-machain-1992-supreme-court-decision-66364
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example