The Verdict of the Supreme Court of the United States Essay

Total Length: 944 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Article One

In the article “Taking DNA from All Criminals Should Be Standard Procedure” written by Cyrus R. Vance Jr, 2012, the author makes a claim that DNA evidence is a powerful crime solver. He also states that this method is a superb technique which can avert rapes, robberies and murders in the hundreds annually at a very low cost to citizens. DNA evidence does not just help catch criminals; it also helps absolve the guiltless ones. A major aim I have had in my position of district attorney is to ensure no one gets convicted wrongly. A tool like this all-crimes DNA archive will strongly aid us in achieving our most important goal which is avoiding erroneous convictions (Vance, 2012).

DNA collection is properly regulated and organized at the eight world-class and government-backed state laboratories where criminal forensic analysis is carried out. Strict rules guide the process of DNA testing and results delivery, with an example being the storing of information as barcode and not in name and whoever violates this will face criminal penalties. During testing, if a match is found within the databank, the samples are tested again most times, two additional times. Gathering the DNA of everyone convicted of crimes has been widely supported by all parties within the state, i.e. victims of crime, their lawyers, the acquitted defendants, the bar associations of the city and state and also the police chiefs, sheriffs and district attorneys of the state.

Stuck Writing Your "The Verdict of the Supreme Court of the United States" Essay?

However, its adoption in the House has been hindered due to some criminal justice laws which are not as widely backed added to it. Let’s try not to make the same error this year (Vance, 2012).

Article Two

Adam Liptak, 2013, brings to light the verdict of the Supreme Court of the United States which allowed DNA samples to be collected by the police from persons held for possible involvement in serious offences. 28 states as well as the federal government itself allow this and the law enforcement agencies see this as an important tool in investigating unresolved crimes. Nevertheless, he noted that; searching a person without a substantial level of suspicion for the purpose of collecting evidence regarding an unconnected crime is forbidden under the Fourth Amendment, a statement the public didn’t counter. “Make no mistake about it: because of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason,” Justice Scalia stated (Liptak, 2013).

In the same vein, The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a conclusion that a….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States" (2017, August 31) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/verdict-supreme-court-united-states-2165911

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States" 31 August 2017. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/verdict-supreme-court-united-states-2165911>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States", 31 August 2017, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/verdict-supreme-court-united-states-2165911