American Politics Term Paper

Total Length: 1857 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 6

American Politics

Introduction to Kevin Phillips

Kevin Phillips is a well-known, controversial yet respected writer and political analyst, who writes about the political and social world of contemporary America with a sense of literary style and an "at the bottom of it" substance. His most recent book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, would seem to give the literary and politically uninitiated all the information needed in terms of where Phillips stands politically - his social and political/philosophical frame of reference. It would be safe to say his investigative, hard-hitting book on George W. Bush's White House would probably not get him an invitation to a Rush Limbaugh insider cocktail party, and yet, Phillips has worked as a Republican strategist, and he was a top political advisor to Richard Nixon during the presidential race in 1968.

In the book this paper reviews, Phillips puts his literary and journalistic microscope on how rich Americans get their wealth, and how they hang onto their wealth. He also brings to light the sometimes subtle and often-times blatant graft and corruption which appears to be a natural offshoot of a culture obsessed with money and with financial power - a culture which basically encourages the currying of favor through financial contributions, which, in turn, buy access to power and the perks that go with it.

In his Introduction, he notes that "Between 1979 and 1989 the portion of the nation's wealth help by the top 1% nearly doubled from 22% to 39%." He refers to a New York Times' article reporting that "within the most prosperous fifth of U.S. Households, national income growth was shared to unevenly that some 90% of that fifth's gain went to the top 1%" (italics are Phillips). This is the nuts and bolts of his argument, that money and power are in the hands of the very few.

Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich

Phillips was interviewed on PBS by Bill Moyer this past March, 2004, and he was asked what he meant by "plutocracy" - a term used in his book Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich - by Moyer. Phillips answered that today's "plutocracy" has "produced the fusion of money and government." What has been visible in the 1980s and 1990s, Phillips continued, is that money has "pretty much taken control of the culture, and controls the whole dynamics of politics." He went on to say that politicians are "so interested in raising money that they can't see their soul in the mirror."

In Wealth and Democracy, Phillips (358-59) writes about the plutocracy (the most recent examples which emerged from the quick and lucrative profits during the "dot com" and technology boom of the 1990s): "One observer summed up the message: In contrast to cruel mill owners and bankers in pinstripes, 'this plutocracy was cool. They were flooding into bohemian neighborhoods like San Francisco's Mission District, chatting with the guys in the band and working on their poetry at Starbucks..."

They" were the young entrepreneurs like those of today who run "Google" and are offering stock later this month at an estimated $108 per share - unheard of for an IPO. And on page 108, still on the subject of plutocracy, Phillips quotes from a Forbes Magazine 1999 editorial: "The extraordinary growth in net worth that began when the market took off in 1982 has produced opulence and ostentation on a scale that previous generations never dreamed possible..." And the plutocracy is controlled by the folks who control Wall Street and corporate goliaths.

It's this very "opulence" and "ostentation" - and arrogance that creeps into the political and social world of America - which Phillips is writing about.

Meanwhile, Phillips' book examines not just today's issues of wealth and power in a democratic society, but it also delves into the history of American wealth, from the American Revolution to what he refers to in his book as "the Second Gilded Age" - the world at the turn of the 21st Century.

Phillips discusses the early development of America's financial system in great detail, setting the stage for today's influence of money on government and politics. Phillips' skilled narrative paints a vivid picture of how Alexander Hamilton, who served at the first secretary of the treasury (1789), feuded with Thomas Jefferson - a bitter fight playing out on the stage of the infant nation - over the basic structure of how government would handle money and finance.
Jefferson had a fear that if there were not proper checks and balances on the money system, a financial upper class of aristocrats could seize a disproportionate share of governmental influence, and in doing so, cut the teeth out of the democratic institutions the founding fathers worked so hard to create.

And has Jefferson's worst fears come to fruition? Phillips thinks they have, and he shows how through his careful time-line tracing of the different periods of concentration of wealth and power from John Jacob Astor to Bill Gates. He shows how, for the past couple hundred years in America, the super rich have made money hand over fist, through questionable government policies such as bailing out banks and giving tax and tariff breaks that reek of patronage. In the meantime, Phillips shows in his book, the middle and lower classes, the blue collar working class people, have been left standing at the gate.

Phillips is terrific at giving succinct examples of how money is made, and what happens to it once it receives the investors or vendors. For example, he talks about the early beginnings of the so-called "new gilded age" - which Phillips alludes to often - and he is alluding to the Reagan Administration in the 1980s. At the beginning of this period, there were 10% unemployed from the workforce, farmers were struggling, the Great Lakes' industrial region was "smarting under its new, dismissive nickname: the Rust Belt" (89). But individuals within the Reagan Administration were promoting the idea that it was a good thing for Americans to all have the ability to get rich, and those same people could see that technology was gaining ground and that they might be financial stirrings in the wind.

And with that as backdrop, Phillips (91) points to "four engines" that put some power into the economy: military spending increases; increasing corporate investments, pushed in part by favorable tax legislation in 1981 (the money went into office buildings, construction and computers); as debt ballooned but corporations and the government borrowed and put that money back into the economy; and fourthly, the activities of financial institutions and individuals exploded, and stock market profits lined the pockets of those who were gaining wealth.

But what did the people who made all the money due to borrowing, do with the money? Reinvest it? Not according to Phillips (92): they "seem to have spent it on consumption; second and third houses, travel, luxury apparel, cars, jewelry, yachts and the like, rather than being saved and invested."

Moreover, Phillips continues, "Between 1979 and 1989 the portion of the nation's wealth held by the top 1% nearly doubled, skyrocketing from 22% to 39%, probably the most rapid escalation" in American history. And, Phillips writes on page 93, after all those rich folks in the top 1% of the U.S. earners had raked in those dollars, "twelve years of Republican presidents had brought little new direction in wealth save for an end to oil domination."

What insights on the American politics have I gained through Phillips' book?

It seems that Thomas Jefferson was right, and Alexander Hamilton was wrong: there has always needed to be structures in place in the United States to keep the elite and very wealthy from grabbing too much power. When one reads the paper, and learns about huge multi-million dollar scandals such as Enron, and others, it is clear that greed governs a lot of what happens in business, and that regulatory agencies do not have enough clout, or just don't do their jobs well enough.

The little guy has always had to struggle, and the powerful always have the money and influence to make legislation and regulation friendly to their interests. In 1983, according to Phillips' book (221), a presidential commission - headed by the man who is now Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Alan Greenspan - reported that yes, under Reagan tax rates for corporations and individuals were coming down, and that was a good thing. Meantime, Greenspan's commission also found that "Social Security and Medicare (payroll) taxes on lower and middle-income Americans had to be increased, and to an extent that would make them more onerous than income taxes for an ever-growing portion of the population."

Again, one reads a book like this and learns what has always been suspected, and that is, the rich get richer, and the poor get higher taxes. The Tax Reform Act.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Muslim Americans and the Impact of September 11th

Americans, legislators and leaders in American politics have adopted "narratives that pit the rights of others (whether defined as immigrants of terrorism suspects) against the public safety...and the use of security as a proxy for other agendas."[footnoteRef:11] The ironic twist here is that in spite of the pro-immigrant words of Kennedy in the mid-20th century, the fact is that American history is full of anti-immigrant legislation. The Chinese Exclusion Act promoted xenophobic, racist attitudes towards Asians in the 19th century and was passed to lay "the groundwork for other racially motivated laws that followed."[footnoteRef:12] WWI… Continue Reading...

Informal and Formal Powers of the President

American Politics The American President is said to be the most powerful man in the world, but it is also said that the President has limited influence over domestic policy. Even if the President is relatively weak in terms of domestic policy, he still has tremendous power, more than just about anyone else. This paper will analyze the different formal and informal ways in which the President exerts influence over domestic policy. The paper will then examine the question of whether or not the President's authority on domestic affairs is… Continue Reading...

World and Native Music

American politics. Some music occurs in a commercial context. Other types of music are more communicative in nature, as when bards sing songs to record history. Furthermore, music needs to be understood as a technical practice. Anyone can make noise on an instrument or device, but it requires technical practice and prowess to make music. Finally, music has important social and psychological dimensions. McAllester,… Continue Reading...

The Things They Carried by Tim OBrien

aggression has impacted on American politics, society and culture. Similarly, O'Brien's work also focuses on the distressing experiences endured by the American soldiers. "The Things They Carried" is popularly seen as one of the best written books on American life after the sufferings of the war (M. Heberle). However, what exactly makes the Vietnam War distinct compared to other wars which America fought in? What brought about an American victory in the Vietnam War? Was the enemy not as equipped and strong as the American military? In his story, O'Brien makes a case for… Continue Reading...

Russian Meddling in U.S. Election Essay

American politics in almost a century.  The Republican candidate, Donald Trump, had no prior political experience of any type.  Hillary Clinton, the projected winner, won a clear majority of the popular vote, but lost the electoral vote by failing to secure wins in states where she was the projected winner.  The Trump victory surprised many political pundits and American voters, who immediately began to wonder what role, if any, rumored Russian interference in the election played in Trump’s victory.  As of October 21, 2017, those issues remained largely unresolved.  Although… Continue Reading...

Immigration Essay

slaves in the colonies, institutionalized racism remained a dark part of American politics and society for centuries. Americans saw Africans as property and resented the wave of Chinese immigrants that came for the promise of work in gold-rich California. The resentment of these new immigrants became so strong that during the 1850’s, an anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant political party formed to severely curb immigration. They succeeded in putting a presidential candidate up for election in 1956 (Millard Filmore) and were able to dominate the political climate of Massachusetts, generating a formidable power there. “Their most spectacular triumph was achieved in Massachusetts. In their… Continue Reading...

Natural Disasters Emergency Management Preparedness

2010. This technological disaster has had—and continues to have—ramifications for American politics and policy related to how to prevent and respond to similar problems in the future. Of course, the event also has had major environmental and social ramifications too. As with all technological disasters, the event can be traced to human error but perhaps more importantly, it shows how emergency management and disaster relief is muddled by politics and the collusion between big business and lawmakers. First responders and later cleanup crews have pending lawsuits related to the fraudulent nondisclosure of toxins (Dermansky, 2018). The BP oil spill shows… Continue Reading...

Net Neutrality Essay

American politics, it becomes clear that the debate over net neutrality is a debate between those who control the internet and those who use it. What is Bad about Net Neutrality? According to arguments made by many ISPs, net neutrality has many negatives.  For example, ISPs complain that competitor services, such as Netflix, Google Phone, Skype, and YouTube, require enormous amounts of data, slowing access for all of their customers without requiring the paid-for services that… Continue Reading...

Whigs Democrats and the Second Party System

the "second party system" era of American politics. In many ways, the second party system's factions closely resembled those of the first party system's. The first party system had the Federalists pitted against the anti-Federalists. Now, the Whigs were akin to the Federalists in that they derived their constituent base from a wealthier and more well-educated and more urban cohort in New England, and tended to favor a stronger centralized government versus their Democrat counterparts. On the contrary, Jackson's Democrats resembled Jefferson's anti-federalists, or Old Republicans who valued states' rights over a strong federal government. One… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"American Politics" (2004, August 08) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/american-politics-173375

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"American Politics" 08 August 2004. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/american-politics-173375>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"American Politics", 08 August 2004, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/american-politics-173375