Bargaining in the Kaiser Permanente Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 894 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 3

The issue of continuity of operations is an example. Kaiser could have stated this as a position - no strikes. However, their interest is not "no strikes" but rather a continuity of operations. The union could have responded to a position of "no strikes" by finding other means of protest, or by taking offense to the suggestion that they surrender one of their core rights. Rather, the union expressed their own interest and the two sides were able to agree on a framework whereby these key interests of both sides were met.

3) Kaiser's had a couple of key entering and exiting points. The first key entering point was when adoption of the initial proposal from DeCicco. The next was the creation of the framework for differentiating national and local issues. In the case of the former, the step was key because it recognized that not only did they have issues but the union did to and it was in everyone's best interest to work through them with a common goal in order to simplify their operating environment. The latter was key because it allowed the negotiations to progress. Whereas Kaiser undoubtedly felt that a national negotiation would be simpler for them, they understood clearly that the issue of national/local differentiation was one of the most crucial interests for the unions.

Stuck Writing Your "Bargaining in the Kaiser Permanente" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Bargaining in the Kaiser Permanente Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



Kaiser's key exit point was when the internal conflict threatened the process. This was a point where the management teams at Kaiser needed to decide if they were going to continue in building together or carve out their own separate fiefdoms ruled by issues particular to each business unit. It was strong consensus building work that averted this exit.

The union's key entry point was when DeCicco first proposed the partnership idea. It was the recognition that the old system was not the ideal, that the interests of the unions could be better served by engaging in a more co-operative model. This was undertaken knowing there would be considerable dissent within the different unions and that a whole new outlook would be required.

The key exit point for the unions was prior to be offered training in internet-based bargaining. Many in the unions were skeptical of the company's motives and in the validity of the process itself. However, they accepted the company's offer to be trained in the process. Were it not for that, the unions would likely have reverted to positional bargaining, as it was the only method they clearly understood.

Works.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bargaining In The Kaiser Permanente" (2008, April 12) Retrieved July 7, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bargaining-kaiser-permanente-30769

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bargaining In The Kaiser Permanente" 12 April 2008. Web.7 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bargaining-kaiser-permanente-30769>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bargaining In The Kaiser Permanente", 12 April 2008, Accessed.7 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bargaining-kaiser-permanente-30769
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example